Profits Spike at Milbank as Firm Exceeds $1 Billion Revenue Mark
While 2018 was another banner financial year for Milbank, the firm is less enthusiastic about the lack of diversity in its all-male new partner class last month.
February 27, 2019 at 03:18 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Milbank's name change and move to a new headquarters this month come after a spike in revenue and profits.
The firm's gross revenue has surpassed the $1 billion mark for the first time, growing by 12.8 percent to $1.034 billion in 2018.
Milbank has been on a growth streak for nearly a decade, with nine years of successive revenue increases, according to ALM data.
Profits per equity partner surged 10.5 percent to $3.825 million last year. Even as total lawyer head count grew more than 5 percent to 728 lawyers, the firm's revenue per lawyer rose by 6.9 percent to $1.42 million.
Scott Edelman, Milbank chairman, speaks proudly about the firm's complex work across litigation, transactional and restructuring practices. Demand was up “across the whole firm,” Edelman said.
Still, he said he's “not happy” about another aspect of the practice: diversity of new partners.
Milbank elected eight lawyers to partner last month, all of them men. “It happens that this year, we did not have a diverse class,” Edelman said. The new partners have not been listed in a firm press release this year, unlike new partner classes in other years.
Diversity of partner promotions are under more scrutiny, as firms in the last few months have faced open criticism from corporate counsel for partnership classes that are predominantly white and male.
“I know the pipeline in future years will be more diverse,” Edelman said in an interview this month. “We're very proud of the individuals in our class but … we're not happy about the lack of diversity.”
Still, in the prior two years, five of the firm's 12 new partners were women, Edelman said, as were several of its lateral partners last year. Meanwhile, partner Stacey Rappaport joined the firm's five-person executive committee last year—the firm's first woman on the committee in its history.
When asked if the lack of gender diversity led the firm to avoid a press release on the promotions, Edelman said the firm was focused on announcing the rebrand and move first. But he also acknowledged that “it's not something we want to go out and proudly tell everybody we made a non-diverse partner class.”
“It's something we talked a lot about internally and we take very seriously,” he said, noting the firm has various initiatives to commit to diversity. “We're very focused” on mentoring and promoting diverse senior associates, he added.
|'Out in Front'
Some of the female lateral partners last year arrived with two high-profile groups in London, including a capital markets team from Shearman & Sterling and a restructuring group from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft.
The firm's European business grew 25 percent last year, Edelman said, including in London, where the firm generated $155.84 million in 2018, up from $124.9 million in 2017.
It wasn't only London seeing more activity.
Milbank was busy in all departments, Edelman said, from its litigation work on behalf of Rabobank over the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) to its patent litigation victories for Tris Pharma and Orexo. The firm was retained to represent the creditor's committee in the FirstEnergy Solutions bankruptcy, while its project finance team last year advised on one of the largest cross-border energy-related transactions in Brazil in recent years.
Net income, rising nearly 14 percent last year to $572.15 million, grew faster than revenue. Edelman said the firm increased its leverage and has started to see “some of the benefits you get with economies of sale.”
Milbank last year sparked the most recent industrywide salary increase for associates, announcing in June that its first-year associate base salaries were rising to $190,000 and it was increasing associate salaries across the board by $10,000 or $15,000. (Ultimately, the firm matched the pay scale that Cravath, Swaine & Moore soon after established for associates.) Since Milbank has over 500 associates, the firmwide raises likely meant an immediate overhead increase in the mid-seven-figure range, The American Lawyer reported at the time.
“Clearly, we would have made more money if the industry hadn't raised associate salaries,” Edelman said in the interview this month, but he added that the industry was doing well and “we were very busy.”
“We could see that trend, so we knew it was going to be a profitable year for the industry and for Milbank,” he said. “That's why we decided to get out in front and share some of the wealth.”
Despite the high revenue growth, the number of equity partners at Milbank has stayed relatively steady the past four years. (Last year, it increased by five to 150 partners). Meanwhile, total nonequity compensation last year increased by nearly 40 percent, as the number of nonequity partners increased by five to 19. Edelman said the increase reflected some lateral partners whose initial compensation isn't directly tied to profits.
In the long term, Milbank wants to move away from the nonequity partnership, he said, for use in “rare situations.”
Milbank's lawyers and staff in the last week have been settling into their new office at 55 Hudson Yards, a move coinciding with a name change that drops Tweed, Hadley and McCloy from the letterhead. The firm had operated under Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy for more than 50 years.
“Frankly we're not in touch with any of their family members at this point,” Edelman said about the former name partners. “It's been so long since they were associated with the firm.”
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFormer Cahill Executive Committee Member, Leveraged Finance Pioneer Dies at 67
To Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Formal Charges Filed Against Judge Accused of Helping Defendant Escape ICE Detention
- 2Top 10 Predicted Business and Human Rights Issues for 2025
- 3$7.5M in Punitive Damages Awarded in Product Liability Case
- 4Does My Company Really Need a Generative AI Policy?
- 5'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250