Husch Blackwell Reports Increase in Revenue and Profits
The increases come as overall head count and the number of equity partners has declined.
February 28, 2019 at 04:18 PM
3 minute read
Midmarket law firm Husch Blackwell reported an uptick in financial results for fiscal year 2018, with gross revenue increasing to $353.5 million from $349 million the year before—a gain of 1.3 percent. Revenue per lawyer rose 3.3 percent, from $568,000 to $587,000 over the same period.
Profits per equity partner also climbed 3.3 percent, from $574,000 to $593,000—but the gain came as the number of equity partners shrank 4.1 percent, from 169 to 162. Firmwide lawyer head count also dropped, from 614 to 602—a 2 percent decline.
“We characterize 2018 as a solid year in what continues to be a challenging marketplace,” said Paul Eberle, the firm's chief executive.
Eberle acknowledged that the strong revenue per lawyer figure is partly a result of having fewer lawyers vying for a piece of the transactional pie. The firm let 40 lawyers go in 2017.
Eberle cited the firm's energy and natural resources practices as a standout in the past year. Since establishing a presence in Houston in 2013 through a tie-up with Brown McCarroll, Husch Blackwell has added bench strength in Houston and now has 17 lawyers there. Recent additions include former city of Houston attorney Arturo Michel and former Harris County Judge Robert Eckels.
Another sweet spot for Husch Blackwell has been litigation, Eberle said.
“We continue to take on more work managing national litigation for larger companies that rely not only on our experience but our ability to manage complex litigation and our relations with local counsel across the country,” Eberle said. “Internal legal teams have been asking us to come in and manage large caseloads of litigation.”
Eberle noted that the firm saw a slight downturn in the volume of its restructuring work in the past year.
He also said the firm has no merger prospects on the horizon but the firm's leadership would not automatically say no to merger talks.
“Nothing is imminent, but we are certainly of the belief that we need to continue to grow and expand our reach geographically and expand the depth of our practices,” Eberle said, adding that the growth of the litigation practice, in particular, raises the prospect of opening doors in new cities in coming years.
Like many law firms, Husch Blackwell has made a massive investment in IT systems and training. The firm hires outside vendors and advisers to test its internal network, including through such exercises as sending phishing emails to employees in order to assess whether they can recognize suspicious emails as such.
“Our entire IT budget has increased in double digits in recent years, and we are moving more and more of our applications out to the cloud,” Eberle said.
The lobbying firm Husch Blackwell Strategies shares the name of the law firm, but its revenues are separately reported and do not figure into the gross revenues reported by the law firm, Eberle said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250