Baker Botts Again Posts Weaker Revenue, Profits, on Fewer Contingency Fees
Gross revenue for Baker Botts dropped 7.3 percent to $678.2 million, and profits per equity partner fell 9.6 percent to $1.66 million.
March 01, 2019 at 02:22 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Baker Botts saw its revenue and profitability take sizable hits in 2018, the firm's second consecutive year of declining financials.
But Andrew Baker, the firm's Houston-based managing partner who will cede that position in a month, said, “the numbers don't tell the story.”
Gross revenue for Baker Botts dropped 7.3 percent to $678.2 million in 2018 compared with $731.8 million in 2017. And revenue per lawyer (RPL) was down 6.2 percent to $958,000, compared with $1.021 million the year before.
Profits per equity partner (PEP) came in at $1.66 million, a 9.6 percent dip from $1.84 million the year before. Net income was $315.9 million, down 4.1 percent compared with $329.3 million in 2017.
Baker said the firm's 2018 financials appear poor because they are compared with 2017, when the firm had significant contingency fee revenue. And the declines in 2017, he said, came after the firm saw record-setting contingency fee revenue in 2016.
“The lion's share, the huge majority of it was the absence of contingency fees,” Baker said about the Houston-based firm's numbers in 2018. “Our partners got unprecedented amounts in '17 and '16. That didn't repeat in 2018. It doesn't mean our business is weaker by its absence,” he said.
Baker said that if “tens of millions” of contingency fees are taken out of the 2017 numbers, 2018 would be a “just below flat” year in comparison. He said 2018 gross revenue would have been slightly less than flat, and PEP would have been up by 1.5-to-2 percent, instead of down by 9.6 percent.
Baker also said 2018 revenue was impacted by a large amount of uncollected receivables that carried over into this year. He said collections in January were “the best in the 179-year-old history of the firm,” and February was excellent, too.
Baker said Baker Botts' revenue in technology and energy were roughly equivalent in 2018. He said work surrounding the technology, media and telecom sector poured in, and the intellectual property and IP litigation practices in particular were busy. The firm's environmental lawyers were very busy, he said.
Corporate work was up, too, Baker said, although the firm experienced some weakness in energy capital markets. Additionally, the firm's antitrust practice, which is global, had a very strong year, he said.
Baker Botts was slightly smaller in 2018 than 2017, with 708 lawyers in 2018 on a full-time equivalent basis, down 1.3 percent when compared with 717 the year before. But the firm had 6.1 percent more equity partners, 190 on an FTE basis, compared with 179 the year before.
Baker said the firm is purposely increasing its equity partner ranks.
“We are doing it as a sign of confidence,” he said.
In 2018, Baker Botts added 19 lateral partners and promoted 12 lawyers to partner, according to Baker. He said 60 percent of the new partners are located outside of Texas, including 19 on the East and West Coasts, which indicates the firm's investment in the future. Among the lateral hires were lawyers in Brussels, London, Riyadh, New York and Washington, D.C., as well as Houston.
On April 1, Palo Alto partner John Martin will succeed Baker, who faces mandatory retirement at the end of the year.
Baker Botts has long differentiated itself as a technology and energy firm and will continue to do so, Martin said in a recent interview. The firm will continue to build strength in Texas, he said, even as it targets growth in London and on the East and West coasts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250