Ex-Associate Alleges North Carolina Firm Used Her as 'Diversity Prop'
Sharika Robinson's complaint calls Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson a "good ol' boys club," but the firm says it's committed to diversity and inclusion.
March 06, 2019 at 05:44 PM
3 minute read
Charlotte, North Carolina-based Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson faces racial discrimination claims from a former associate who alleges the law firm markets itself as committed to maintaining a diverse workforce when, in reality, it's dominated by white males and uses women and minority lawyers as “diversity props” to attract clients.
The former associate, Sharika Robinson, lodged a race bias lawsuit against Robinson Bradshaw on Monday in Charlotte federal district court. Among other claims in her complaint, Robinson's lawyers allege that she was lured in as an associate by false promises that her diverse background as a black woman would be embraced at the firm.
“In truth, Robinson Bradshaw secretly remains [a] 'good ol' boys club' dominated by white male partners,” lawyers for Robinson wrote in her complaint. “The firm uses minorities and women lawyers as 'diversity props' to impress clients while overtly, systematically, implicitly, and intentionally discriminating against and oppressing them.”
Robinson was hired at the firm in February 2015 and served as a litigation associate until her departure. She is represented in the race bias action by Chicago-based solo practitioners Carmen Caruso and Linda Chatman, as well as Durham, North Carolina-based T. Gregory Doucette.
Robinson Bradshaw, which has roughly 140 lawyers across three offices in North Carolina and South Carolina, denied the discrimination claims in a statement Wednesday by the firm's general counsel, Kate Maynard.
“Robinson Bradshaw denies Sharika Robinson's claims, and specifically denies that the firm discriminated against her in any way,” Maynard said in the statement. “We are committed to diversity and inclusion, as evidenced by our attorneys' contributions to the firm, profession and community as a whole.”
Beyond her allegations that the law firm's leadership is dominated by white men, Robinson alleges that she raised complaints of potential racial bias within the firm several times, but that no action was taken as a result. She also alleges that she faced retaliation in the wake of her complaints within the firm, saying that Robinson Bradshaw cut her off from meaningful work and left her isolated.
Robinson's complaint also references a specific set of events in December 2016, when Robinson was allegedly invited by a black male partner named Robert Harrington to a firm-sponsored holiday party. The party was only for black lawyers at Robinson Bradshaw and its attendees were barred from discussing racial issues while there, the suit alleges.
Robinson's lawyers describe the holiday party as “segregated” and call it “an early signal she had unknowingly been recruited to a contemporary version of an old-fashioned Southern plantation.”
Along with the law firm, Robinson's suit names four male partners as defendants. Harrington, who co-leads Robinson Bradshaw's litigation practice, is the only black partner named as a defendant. The other three—managing partner Allen Robertson, litigator Jonathan Krisko and litigator Gregory Skidmore, who's also a former partner at Kirkland & Ellis—are white.
The complaint includes claims under federal law that Robinson Bradshaw subjected the former associate to disparate treatment, created a hostile work environment and unlawfully retaliated against Robinson. It also includes a fraud claim against the law firm under North Carolina's Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllActions Speak Louder Than Words: Law Firms Shrink From 'Performative' Statements
6 minute readNorton Rose Lawyers Accused of Accessing Confidential Material in Internal IT Probe
3 minute read'It's Not About Speed': Forging Strong Legal Department-Law Firm Relationships Starts With Humility, Trust
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250