Five Years Later, Was Carlton Fields' Merger a Failure?
In 2014, Tampa-based Carlton Fields merged with Jorden Burt. On Wednesday, James Jorden and Frank Burt left to join Drinker Biddle & Reath, raising questions about whether the merger was worthwhile.
March 07, 2019 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
Carlton Fields / Photo: J. Albert Diaz/ALM
Five years after the merger between Carlton Fields and Jorden Burt took effect, the benefits of the union seem a lot less clear.
On Wednesday, name partners James Jorden and Frank Burt left the firm to join Drinker Biddle & Reath along with 16 other litigators. A week earlier, Carlton Fields dropped Jorden Burt from its name.
Five years ago, one of the stated goals of the merger was growth. Now, it appears that growth was only temporary, as the number of lawyers at Carlton Fields is now back to its pre-merger level.
Carlton Fields had 272 lawyers before the merger five years ago. The merger did boost Carlton Fields' head count to 339 lawyers. But in 2018, before the most recent departures, the firm reported a lawyer head count of 277, only five more lawyers than before the two firms merged.
Also, of the 48 legacy Jorden Burt partners who moved over to the combined firm at the time of the merger, 30 have left, according to data from ALM Intelligence.
Back in 2015, Carlton Fields President and CEO Gary Sasso lauded the synergy between the two firms, which had similar practice areas, as Carlton Fields pushed for geographic expansion.
“The remarkable thing about this merger, which you almost never see, is that the profits per partner numbers were virtually identical,” Sasso said in an interview with The American Lawyer. “It's a tremendous benefit because you don't have one side saying they are stronger than the other side. Partners feel equal, and I think it makes for a stronger merger.”
Carlton Fields posted strong numbers that year. The firm vaulted 20 spots up the Am Law 200 rankings, from No. 156 to No. 136. Gross revenue jumped 23 percent to $233 million. The head count ballooned to 353 from 272. The firm also opened a Los Angeles office in 2014, which Sasso said was a direct result of the merger.
“I don't think Carlton Fields would have opened the office without Jorden Burt. That was the tipping point,” he said in 2015.
But in the years since, there have been signs that the merger wasn't going as planned. Profit margins started slipping, then gross revenue. In 2018, the firm posted revenues of $182 million, a 12 percent drop from its 2015 peak.
Before news that Jorden and others had jumped to Drinker, Carlton Fields announced it would be moving all 150 Miami employees from its current 69,000-square-foot space on the 42nd floor of the Miami Tower in downtown Miami to a 50,000-square-foot office across two-and-a-half floors at 2 MiamiCentral at the Virgin Trains USA station nearby.
Carlton Fields declined to comment for this article. But in a statement, it reiterated what it said earlier regarding Jorden's departure, that it wished the departing group continued success. It also emphasized that its class action and insurance litigation practices remain strong, and that its financial services, regulatory and transactional attorneys have remained with the firm. “We will not miss a beat in terms of our ability to meet the needs of our financial services clients and this industry sector,” it said in the statement.
On Wednesday, Drinker Biddle said it is eyeing an expansion into Miami in order to accommodate Jorden's group. More Carlton Fields attorneys may join the firm, it said.
Related Stories:
Drinker Biddle Takes 17 Litigators, Led by Jorden, From Carlton Fields
How the Carlton Fields Jorden Burt Merger Paid Off
Drinker Biddle Revenue Up 6.3 Percent, PPP Grows 8.9 Percent
Lizzy McLellan and Lidia Dinkova contributed to this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All!['None of Us Like It': How Expedited Summer Associate Recruiting Affects Law Students and the Firms Hiring Them 'None of Us Like It': How Expedited Summer Associate Recruiting Affects Law Students and the Firms Hiring Them](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/78/a3/6a3907574038b1c9149206cf2a4c/recruitment-767x633-1.jpg)
'None of Us Like It': How Expedited Summer Associate Recruiting Affects Law Students and the Firms Hiring Them
!['A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options 'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/02/c8/47d457c84e2ba6f1200184b3b2e2/murphy-767x633-1.jpg)
'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
7 minute read![What Happens When Lateral Partners’ Guaranteed Compensation Ends? What Happens When Lateral Partners’ Guaranteed Compensation Ends?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/9c/47/f55d72654a2f9fc53f8bd33ff307/business-handshake-767x633.jpg)
What Happens When Lateral Partners’ Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
![How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/08/74/d52420804282a7dfc379a3c57b89/human-resources-767x633-10.jpg)
How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 2'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 3Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 4Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 5‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250