FisherPhillips Makes Big Gains in Revenue, Profit
A jump in demand fueled the national labor and employment firm's profit rebound.
March 14, 2019 at 06:23 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
Fisher & Phillips posted significant increases in revenue and profit last year, following a growth slowdown for both metrics in 2017.
The national labor and employment firm's revenue surged 9.5 percent to $200.65 million, and net income grew 4.7 percent to $70.13 million.
A 6.3 percent head count increase meant all the revenue gain did not translate into higher revenue per lawyer (RPL), which increased by 3.1 percent to $572,000.
The firm also incurred expenses from an ongoing technology investment push and higher associate salaries. As a result, profit per equity partner (PEP) increased at a slower rate than net income, rising 3.6 percent to $574,000. That was a big improvement, however, from 2017, when PEP declined slightly, by 1.1 percent ($6,000) to $554,000.
FisherPhillips' chairman, Roger Quillen, who is marking his 20th anniversary in June as chairman and managing partner, attributed the 9.5 percent revenue jump mostly to a notable increase in client demand, which grew by 7.3 percent last year. Productivity per lawyer also increased slightly, by 1.1 percent, he said, and the firm raised its effective billing rate by 2.6 percent, on par with the industry.
By contrast, in 2017 average billable hours per attorney had declined by 1.4 percent and the firm experienced an unusual degree of associate attrition, which Quillen told the Daily Report last year stemmed from pay scales that were no longer competitive in some cities.
Quillen said that last year the firm reviewed associate salaries city by city and made increases, and then it further adjusted salaries in some areas in January to meet the market rate in New York, Chicago, Boston, California and other competitive legal markets. “We are very market-driven,” he said.
The firm also continued to invest heavily in IT upgrades, which encompassed personnel, hardware and software, Quillen said, increasing its usual IT spend by $3 million last year. “FisherPhillips is investing heavily to ensure a long-term competitive position vis a vis our largest competitors,” Quillen said.
Improving internet security and data privacy has been one push. Sophisticated clients, Quillen noted, now audit their outside firms on the level of data privacy and cybersecurity protections. “They do not want their law firm to be the weak link,” he said.
Investing in data analytics and knowledge management, which can make pricing and outcomes more predictable for clients, has been another focus. Finally, FisherPhillips has invested in its client-focused extranet. “In the legal industry there is great concern for legal tech, not just internally but in how we interface with clients. We want it to be friendly and compatible with clients who want to interface in this way,” Quillen said.
FisherPhillips has budgeted a similar increased spend on IT for 2019, Quillen added.
|The Talent
While the firm added no new offices last year, its 6.3 percent attorney head count increase amounts to almost double its lawyer growth rate in 2017. Average attorney head count for 2018 grew by a net of 21 lawyers, but the firm actually had increased head count at year-end by a net of 40 lawyers, Quillen said, ending the year with about 370 attorneys.
The firm lost roughly 40 attorneys to attrition, and half of those went in-house, Quillen said, as companies continue to build up their in-house legal departments. He identified the lure of the in-house law department as one of the top challenges facing large law firms. “It costs us talented attorneys,” he said, adding that it also affects the volume of work and pricing.
FisherPhillips made some big lateral hires in Washington, recruiting Theresa Connolly, an employment litigation partner with a focus on trade secret misappropriation, from Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete to become the head of its office there, along with another Constangy partner, Boyd Rogers, who worked closely with her. (Rogers later took an in-house job at HR provider TriNet as managing counsel for HR compliance, labor and employment.)
The firm expanded its D.C. presence in January by acquiring a six-lawyer employment law boutique, The Farrington Law Firm, including partners Dan Farrington, Margaret Jacobsen Scheele and Sarah Biran. Farrington became the co-managing partner with Connolly for the D.C. operation.
FisherPhillips announced in June that it had named Southern California-based partner Regina Petty as its first chief diversity officer.
As far as practice activity, Quillen said FisherPhillips is “extremely busy” in states with aggressive enforcement regimes and active plaintiffs bars as the federal regulatory regime continues to lag. “We are struggling to meet our attorney hiring needs in those states,” he added.
Laws and regulations around gender pay equity are an active area, he said, along with an increase in sexual harassment claims. Medical and recreational marijuana as it affects the workplace is also a hot area, since there are significantly conflicting federal, state and local laws.
“We are assuming in our planning a recession late in the year,” Quillen said, but he added that FisherPhillips is not seeing any indicators so far in its practice activity.
Labor and employment firms generally see an uptick in single-plaintiff workplace complaints for their clients during a recession, he added, because it's harder for employees to get a new job elsewhere.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute readGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Trending Stories
- 1Former McCarter & English Associate Fired Over 'Gangsta Rap' LinkedIn Post Sues Over Discrimination, Retaliation
- 2First-of-Its-Kind Parkinson’s Patch at Center of Fight Over FDA Approval of Generic Version
- 3The end of the 'Rust' criminal case against Alec Baldwin may unlock a civil lawsuit
- 4Solana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
- 5What We Heard From Litigation Leaders This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250