Davis Wright Tremaine Sees Gains in Revenue and Profit
The firm saw a slight decline in the number of equity partners, while its total head count remained flat.
March 27, 2019 at 04:38 PM
3 minute read
Davis Wright Tremaine posted notable gains in profits and revenue in 2018.
Gross revenue grew 5.7 percent, from $357.5 million to $377.9 million, as net income rose 5.9 percent, from $121.7 million to $128.8 million. Profits per equity partner saw a sizable increase of 9.2 percent, from $716,000 to $782,000.
The number of equity partners dropped to 165 from 170, and total head count remained flat at 521 attorneys.
Sarah English Tune, chair of the firm's corporate and business transactions practice, said much of the growth is due to the firm's strategy of empowering its younger attorneys.
“We put our young partners in leadership positions,” Tune said. “We've really given our younger attorneys, especially younger partners, the opportunity and support to develop their practice.”
As an example, Tune pointed out the firm's food and beverage practice, created “essentially from scratch” by Davis Wright partner Jesse Lyon. The practice area was critical to assisting on a $120 million acquisition of vegan meat and cheese company Field Roast Grain Meat Co. by Maple Leaf Foods in January of last year. Don Buder, also part of the practice group, was instrumental in helping with the organizing and opening of Naturally Bay Area, a food and beverage industry group.
Davis Wright's large media practice also had a great year, according to firm leaders. Chief strategy officer Mark Usellis said the attention on the media has generated significant business as the firm represented a slate of major news outlets during litigation in 2018, including BuzzFeed, The New York Times, CNN and the Washington Post. (Amazon is also a major client of the firm.)
Looking toward 2019, the firm revamped its five-year strategic plan. Tune said the new blueprint is similar to the previous one, as the firm looks to continue the success it had over the last five years. Since 2014, Davis Wright has consistently outperformed peer firms in revenue growth and profits per equity partner, according to ALM Intelligence. The firm's gross revenue grew 32.6 percent, from $285 million to $378 million, over that period. Profits per partner rose from $540,000 to $782,000—a 44.8 percent increase.
“I feel like we got a pretty good approach going, and it's really a matter of being disciplined and focused,” Usellis said. “We want to be entrepreneurial. We don't want to be stagnant.”
|Similar Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute readGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250