For Lanny Davis, Silence Is Not an Option When Crisis Hits
Davis has a focused understanding of a lawyer's role in times of crisis.
March 28, 2019 at 05:30 AM
4 minute read
“Tell it often, tell it early, tell it yourself.” That's the subtitle of Lanny Davis' 1999 memoir about his time in the Clinton White House, when he answered 125 phone calls a day from members of the press chasing stories about purported campaign finance violations and other percolating scandals.
And it's an indication that Davis, whose latest in a long string of high-profile and often unsympathetic clients is President Donald Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen, has a different, more focused understanding of a lawyer's role in times of crisis.
After his return to private practice at Patton Boggs in 1998, the one-time litigator found himself giving clients advice that broke from what they heard from other attorneys.
“I became something of a renegade or a rogue lawyer in my profession, disagreeing with my fellows that 'no comment' was a strategy to save a reputation, or company or share value,” he says.
Since then, Davis has taken his law practice through Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe; McDermott Will & Emery; and Dilworth Paxson. In 2016, he launched Davis Goldberg & Galper with two colleagues who were with him at both Patton Boggs and Orrick. As an indication of the firm's priorities, it's tightly intertwined with D.C. public relations firm Trident DMG. When Cohen appeared before the House Oversight Committee in February, both Davis and his Trident co-founder, PR specialist Eleanor McManus, were seated directly behind him.
Testifying under oath before a group of elected representatives eager to score points with a national television audience is an act that benefits from legal and media advice, which Davis and his team are happy to provide. But he's also built his crisis management practice on the notion that lawyers wield a crucial tool that PR specialists lack: attorney-client privilege.
That insight emerged, Davis says, during his stint as special counsel for President Clinton. Lawyers met daily to discuss special prosecutor Kenneth Starr's inquiry—not just how to respond to discovery requests and handle the investigation, but also how to handle the press. White House press secretary Mike McCurry was excluded from the conversation. “I can't go into that room,” he'd tell Davis. “Make sure you do not leave that room of lawyers without your blood being on the floor.”
“What he meant,” Davis explains, “was I had to argue and argue and argue using the vocabulary of lawyers.”
Davis says he had to make the case for Clinton's team pre-emptively getting the facts out, rather than reacting, as lawyers often recommend.
His law partner Joshua Galper, who joined the White House office of legal counsel after Davis' departure for a law school summer, says the principle now guides the firm's work for corporate clients and individuals: “It's that same idea of law, politics and media all under the attorney-client relationship,” he says.
For privilege to apply, the attorneys' legal skills have to be part of the equation. In 2001, a federal judge found that privilege did not apply to the communications between former White House counsel Jack Quinn, now a partner at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, and fugitive financier Marc Rich in pursuit of a pardon from President Clinton.
Adam Goldberg, the third partner in the operation, assures that there is a legal dimension to their work, saying that much of what they do is aimed at heading off a potential crisis.
“We just had a client a couple months ago who was thinking of engaging in a very high-profile transaction. They just wanted to make sure they were looking at it from all the different perspectives,” Goldberg says.
The client's other legal counsel wasn't fully attuned to certain regulatory and reputational angles of the matter, so Davis Goldberg & Galper weighed the media response and how to respond to federal agencies and forces on Capitol Hill.
As Davis sees it, the growing number of law firms tacking on crisis management work shows that others are coming around to his perspective: In the face of scrutiny, silence is not an option.
“A lawyer can't help a client when their shares are going down and they're being attacked in the media,” he says.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Ready to Respond': Wilmer's Robert Kimmitt and Covington's Stephen Rademaker Worked to Free U.S. Journalists
3 minute readNewly Formed DEI Practices Expect Heightened Demand During Trump Administration
Trending Stories
- 1In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 2Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 3The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 4Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 5Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250