Holland & Hart Reports Drops in Revenue, Profits and Head Count
"We're trying to anticipate what the changing needs of our clients are and partnering with them in ways that they love," said firm chair Liz Sharrer.
March 29, 2019 at 06:14 PM
4 minute read
The mid-size law firm Holland & Hart posted declines in revenue, profits and head count in 2018 as it lost 16 partners in a hot lateral market.
The firm's gross revenue dropped 5.1 percent, from $249 million to $236.2 million as net income saw an 8.5 percent decline, from $96.5 million to $88.3 million. Profits per equity partner decreased by 3.1 percent, from $445,000 to $431,000.
The firm's head count also fell by 8.8 percent—from 443 attorneys to 404.
Despite the numbers, Holland & Hart firm chair Liz Sharrer said the year was a good one for the firm. She noted that revenue per lawyer rose 4.1 percent, from $562,000 to $585,000.
“We're actually happy with 2018,” Sharrer said. “Our lawyers were very busy and did a lot of work.”
The firm's patent practice saw a 20 percent increase in revenue year over year, she said. And for 2019, the practice is on track for another 25 percent increase, she said.
The firm's energy practice, an area where the mid-sized Colorado-based firm first made its name, is also performing well, according to Sharrer. Not only is the firm advising in the oil, gas and mining space, but Holland & Hart's renewables practice is increasingly landing work, she said. Additionally, the firm's corporate and M&A practice saw $3 billion in transactions last year, said Sharrer.
The active lateral market did take a toll on the firm, however. And retirements also had an impact.
Holland & Hart saw two major groups leave for Dorsey & Whitney: A group of ten intellectual property partners left in February, and a seven-lawyer corporate transactions team left in September. Polsinelli picked up three former Holland & Hart partners in Colorado early in the year, and Las Vegas office managing partner Patrick Reilly joined Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck.
The firm added only one lateral partner—former Stoel Rives partner Loren Hulse.
Holland & Hart has also transitioned from a one-tiered equity partnership to a multilevel partnership split into three parts: income partner, equity partner and senior partner. Sharrer said the change was aimed at retaining and recruiting talent.
“In this really competitive market, we have a lot of really good senior associates that deserve that title,” she said.
Income partners are most analogous to non-equity partners in that they don't participate in profit sharing but they do engage in the firm's governance. Senior partners serve a quasi-of counsel role, although, like income partners, they are active in the firm's governance.
Sharrer stressed that Holland & Hart will avoid the pitfall of many multitiered partnerships, wherein an associate makes non-equity partner with little opportunity to advance to equity partner. She calls this phenomenon a “parking spot.”
The firm has promoted five attorneys to income partner, nine to senior partner and four to equity partner since the beginning of this calendar year.
Throughout the year, Sherrar said the firm will make “strategic hires” in key areas such as tax, renewables and intellectual property. She also said the firm will continue to leverage its 2017 investment into an innovation office led by Technology & Innovation Officer Duc Chu.
“We're trying to anticipate what the changing needs of our clients are and partnering with them in ways that they love,” said Sharrer. “That's where we see the most success in clients that are coming back and growing our work.”
|Similar Stories:
Dorsey Doubles Down on Salt Lake City With Holland & Hart Hires
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250