Miles & Stockbridge Took a Hit in 2018 But Sees Promise in DC
CEO Joe Hovermill says the Baltimore-based firm has aggressive growth goals in a tough lateral market.
April 03, 2019 at 04:54 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Miles & Stockbridge suffered a dip in revenue and a big ding to partner profits in 2018 in the aftermath of a lateral raid by a new Big Law rival in its hometown.
Gross revenue dropped 1.7 percent last year to little more than $114.6 million, and profits per equity partner sank 14.2 percent to $411,000. Net income declined 13.3 percent to $30.96 million last year.
Joseph Hovermill, president and CEO of Miles & Stockbridge, said the Baltimore-based firm's revenue dip was largely attributable to Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough taking 11 partners in February to start its own Baltimore operation and noted a few more lawyers joined the departing group than expected.
Hovermill noted that some senior lawyers had also left the firm or were taking a step back in their workload. “There's always going to be some inherent revenue bleed from those transitions—if for nothing else just the rate differences between the folks doing the same work,” he said. Overall, rates at Miles & Stockbridge rose little more than 3 percent in 2018, according to Hovermill.
Despite the departures, Miles & Stockbridge reported its total lawyer head count declining by just one lawyer year-over-year. The size of the equity partnership remained unchanged at 75 partners, and the firm last year added a nine-lawyer affordable housing and tax credit team from Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner in D.C.
Hovermill said he was “happy on how the year ended up.”
“I'd say that the revenue being down a little and the partner comp being down more from our standpoint is actually, from our standpoint, sort of a positive sign of the minimal long-term impact those departures had on us,” Hovermill said.
Miles & Stockbridge's expansion in D.C. foreshadowed its strategy to lean into the nation's capital in 2019. The firm is moving offices in April, and Hovermill described the difference between its current space on K Street and its future office on Pennsylvania Avenue as “night and day.”
Miles & Stockbridge announced news of its Washington upgrade last November and said it wanted to double its Washington head count in the process. Hovermill said the firm's goal remains to “aggressively grow” its D.C. office so that its Baltimore and D.C.-area head count are roughly the same.
The lateral hiring competition that bedeviled Miles & Stockbridge in 2018 was another sign of the pressures that the Mid-Atlantic's Second Hundred firms are facing. Big national and international firms remained largely unaffected by the challenges in the D.C. market, while their somewhat smaller counterparts suffered encroachments by larger competitors for work and talent.
Still, Hovermill sounded an optimistic note, especially about D.C.
“We think we have a real value proposition for some folks that are getting priced out of representing their clients at some of the international firms,” Hovermill said. “We can bring a practice in that would be kind of above our Baltimore rates, but way less than maybe a principal is being asked to charge his clients in an international law firm—and that's a win for us. We're already realizing that.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250