After Netting Nearly $100M in Contingency Fees, Winston Sees More Revenue Growth
The firm's work this year could allow the firm to reach $1 billion in revenue, a 2019 goal set by chair Thomas Fitzgerald.
April 09, 2019 at 03:43 PM
4 minute read
In a year when Am Law 100 firms are regularly announcing year-on-year revenue growth in excess of 10 percent, Winston & Strawn's 1.3 percent top-line nudge to $991 million in 2018 doesn't initially look like much to celebrate.
But that is before you take into account the contingency fee windfall the firm received in 2017, which chair Thomas Fitzgerald said in an interview was nearly $100 million. Deducting those fees from the year-on-year comparison, Winston's revenue bump last year would have been closer to 12 percent, Fitzgerald said.
Winston's profits per equity partner were virtually flat at $2.16 million even as its equity partner head count rose nearly 9 percent to 152 partners, according to preliminary ALM data. Revenue per lawyer fell nearly 4 percent to $1.1 million.
The firm's financial performance last year was aided by a lateral partner hiring spree that Fitzgerald led in 2017. The firm added more than 100 partners, he said, and those partners were largely in place during 2018, helping to “pick up the slack” from the one-off contingency fees.
“It was a tough road. We were focused on it,” Fitzgerald said of beating the firm's 2017 financial performance. “We thought we had put in place the necessary people in the necessary markets and given them support and let them run. [But] it was not easy.”
The high-profile contingency fee win Winston secured in 2017 was for the firm's work representing a beef manufacturing business in a libel suit against ABC News related to its reports labeling the company's product “pink slime.” Though the size of the settlement in that case has not been disclosed, The Walt Disney Co. which owns ABC, said in a regulatory filing last year that it had paid $177 million more than its insurance coverage to settle the case.
Fitzgerald declined to specify Winston's contingency fee in that case. He noted that the nearly $100 million figure in 2017 also included contingency fees from two other cases.
The firm used a portion of that money to invest in lateral hires in 2017, including launching a Dallas office with nearly 25 partners. That office today has nearly 70 lawyers, according to the firm's website.
Fitzgerald said the firm had paused its lateral hiring campaign this summer to focus on integrating its new hires with the firm's legacy partnership. But Fitzgerald has been back on the recruiting trail more recently and he said he has focused on growing domestically in Washington, D.C., and California and internationally in London and Hong Kong.
Winston has this year already made moves in those international markets, hiring former Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe corporate partner Anthony Riley in London and bringing aboard capital markets partner Khoon Jin Tan from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati in Hong Kong.
The firm also is poised in 2019 to earn an eight-figure fee for its work winning an injunction barring the National Collegiate Athletic Association from capping education-related benefits for certain college athletes. The firm has asked for more than $24 million based on the firm's historical billing rates and the more than 40,000 hours it says it put into the case.
That revenue could help Fitzgerald reach a revenue milestone that, three years ago, he set for the firm in 2019: $1 billion.
“We'll do that this year, and we'll satisfy another goal of the strategic plan,” Fitzgerald said. “And once we do that, we will sit down and focus on the future. But right now we are capturing some clients that we had not heretofore had.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250