Arnold & Porter Stays 'On Track' With Modest Revenue Growth
With a slightly smaller partnership in the second year after its merger with Kaye Scholer, the firm posted slight gains in revenue and partner profits in 2018.
April 09, 2019 at 03:08 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
In the second year after the merger that created Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, the firm grew modestly as it re-embraced its original brand.
Gross revenues at the firm rose 1 percent to $961.2 million, while net income was effectively flat at $383.5 million. Declines in head count, particularly among its partnership, resulted in slightly stronger growth in profits per equity partner (PEP) and revenue per lawyer (RPL).
PEP rose 4.3 percent to $1.242 million as the partnership lost a net of 13 lawyers last year. The firm overall shrank by 11 lawyers, yielding a rise in RPL of 2.3 percent, to $1.024 million.
“We are on track for where I expected us to be in terms of the merger,” said Richard Alexander, the firm's chairman.
Alexander said he measured the merger's success by evaluating the reaction from clients and the impact on recruiting and retention. He said the feedback was positive on those fronts, calling the operational and cultural integration of Arnold & Porter and New York's Kaye Scholer a success.
“I underestimated how intensely people-oriented making a successful merger is,” Alexander said, noting how much time he spent meeting with colleagues along the way. It was “a very good investment for me, but it's been a busy two years in that regard,” he said.
While legally still Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, last year the firm quietly removed “Kaye Scholer” from the masthead on its website and changed its website domain to arnoldporter.com from apks.com. The legacy D.C. firm now appears, on the outside, much in the same way it did before the merger.
That's not to say there haven't been important changes. Alexander said in the last year the firm added 24 laterals, including 15 partners, seven counsel and two policy advisers. One of those lateral partner recruits, Paul Fishman, opened an office in Newark, New Jersey, with the goal of creating a “serious, established presence” in the Garden State. Fishman, who was U.S. attorney for seven years in New Jersey before coming on board, followed John Fietkiewicz, who became senior counsel at Arnold & Porter in May 2018 after serving with Fishman.
More recently, the head of Arnold & Porter's appellate and Supreme Court practice, Lisa Blatt, left the firm for Williams & Connolly, where she was an associate early in her career. At Arnold & Porter, Blatt earned bragging rights for arguing more cases before the Supreme Court than any woman before her and introduced Justice Brett Kavanaugh at Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on his nomination.
Alexander called Blatt's departure a “regretted loss,” and noted her exit had no connection with her role in Kavanaugh's confirmation.
Earlier this year, Arnold & Porter announced it is opening an office in South Korea, led by James Lee, who joined the firm in December.
“We're not making decisions to go to a location to be in a location,” Alexander said. “We're making a decision to go to a location because we view an opportunity for client service and client expansion.”
In the coming year, Alexander said to expect continued growth beyond its D.C. and New York offices, citing the West Coast as a target region for expansion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute readGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Trending Stories
- 1Alston & Bird Matches Market Rate for Associate Bonuses
- 2Commentary: Freedom's Just Another Word
- 3Former McCarter & English Associate Fired Over 'Gangsta Rap' LinkedIn Post Sues Over Discrimination, Retaliation
- 4First-of-Its-Kind Parkinson’s Patch at Center of Fight Over FDA Approval of Generic Version
- 5The end of the 'Rust' criminal case against Alec Baldwin may unlock a civil lawsuit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250