Foley & Lardner Reaps Big Gains From Gardere Merger
The firm tracked at least $10 million in new work that resulted from the April 2018 merger.
April 09, 2019 at 05:13 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Foley & Lardner saw gross revenue and net income swell in 2018, as its merger with Dallas-based Gardere Wynne Sewell bore fruit.
Gross revenue hit $836.7 million for the Milwaukee-based Foley & Lardner, an increase of 21.9 percent, compared with $686.2 million in 2017. Net income was up 15.5 percent, at $195.3 million, compared with $169.1 million the year before.
And even with a much higher head count, revenue per lawyer (RPL) came in at $858,000 in 2018, up 2.9 percent from $834,000 in 2017.
Profits per equity partner (PEP) were $1.251 million, up 7.2 percent from $1.167 million the year before.
That's a big change in metrics for the lawyers who came from Gardere Wynne—the combined firm's 2018 RPL was 35.3 percent higher than Gardere Wynne's 2017 RPL of $634,000, and 2018 PEP was 52 percent greater than Gardere Wynne's $823,000 in 2017.
The two firms officially merged April 1, 2018.
“We were delighted in the growth this year, particularly with all of the expenses associated with the consolidation and, frankly, the effort,” said Jay Rothman, a partner in Milwaukee who is chairman and chief executive officer of the firm.
The merger created a 1,100-lawyer firm with offices in 24 cities in the United States, Mexico, Asia and Europe. The combined firm is known as Foley Gardere in Austin, Dallas, Denver and Houston, and Foley Gardere Arena in Mexico City.
|Speedy Integration
Dallas partner Holland “Holly” O'Neil, a member of the firm's management committee and chair of pre-merger Gardere Wynne, said the firms were well-prepared for the integration thanks to a lot of planning and meeting even before the deal closed.
A number of practice areas have already meshed well, Rothman said, pointing to corporate, litigation and intellectual property.
Rothman said the firm tracked what he calls “but for” revenue, which is work that resulted from cross-selling and cooperation between lawyers from both legacy firms. That work totaled at least $10 million, he said.
In the months between the merger and the end of the fiscal year on Jan. 31, the firm opened about 125 new matters which accounted for about 15,00 billable hours, Rothman said.
“In our corporate practice alone, we did 200 joint pitches,” he added.
Rothman said Gardere Wynne's strength in Texas and Mexico was valuable, particularly because legacy Foley & Lardner clients were driving the firm to those markets. The firm now has broader capabilities, a deeper bench and more geographic dispersion, he said.
“It's been very, very positive for the Gardere legacy lawyers as well,” O'Neil said.
There were nevertheless out-of-pocket expenses incurred with linking the firms, Rothman said, including the opportunity cost of having lawyers and professionals spend time together on meetings that were unrelated to client work.
“There were expenses, when you think about technology and getting people in front of each other,” Rothman said, estimating that those costs totaled between $8 million and $10 million.
But O'Neil said the number of planning conversations between the two firms pre-merger mitigated the integration costs post-combination.
“The sort of pre-closing process of integration planning and getting people together really turned out to be incredibly valuable for us, and was really an accelerator of the benefits,” she said.
Rothman said he is encouraged by the fact the firm boosted its revenue by 21.9 percent—outpacing the 18.6 percent increase in lawyer head count—despite the one-time integration costs.
In 2019, Rothman said, the firm has shifted its focus from integration to lateral hiring in areas including energy—Foley added an alternative energy practice to Texas firm Gardere Wynne's oil and gas practice—corporate, high-stakes litigation, bankruptcy, False Claims Act litigation, tax, supply chain, health care, and technology including cybersecurity, technology transfers, patent prosecution and intellectual property defense.
“We view this as evolutionary. It is iterative. We will never be done,” he said.
Aside from the merger, the firm also made individual lateral hires in Texas last year. They included Craig Chick, who joined the Austin office in April 2018 as a director of public affairs in the government solutions practice, and counsel Neal Bakare in Houston, a former in-house lawyer for Macquarie Bank who joined Foley & Lardner to do energy and finance work.
But Foley & Lardner also lost some legacy Gardere Wynne lawyers in Texas immediately before and shortly after the merger, and the firm ended up with a head count of 975 on a full-time equivalent basis for 2018.
The departures include a 14-lawyer team that joined Husch Blackwell in Houston; three energy litigators who moved to Bradley Arant Boult Cummings in Houston; two IP litigators who left, due to a client conflict, to join Crowe & Dunlevy in Dallas; and six real estate lawyers who moved to Jackson Walker's Dallas office.
Rothman said the firm is off to a good start in 2019, but he declines to make predictions.
“We have been exceeding our budget on productivity … We continue to remain busy, but it's barely two months into the fiscal year,” he said.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250