Law Firms May Want to Hire Legal Ops-Trained Law Grads
Law schools are looking for ways to bring legal operations training into the classroom, potentially creating a new path for lawyers in Big Law and an opportunity for firms to provide what clients really want.
April 12, 2019 at 04:15 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
As law firms begin to emulate their clients when it comes to creating legal operations roles, they may want to join the push to increase such training in law schools.
Despite legal operations becoming popular in corporate legal departments, there is not a specific track for those jobs in law schools. However, experts in the field say the time is coming when law students will be learning more about jobs in legal operations. And some are already headed down that path.
Nathan Wenzel, CEO of SimpleLegal, a legal operations software platform, said there is a lot of interest in the field. With the rise in organizations such as Corporate Legal Operations Consortium, or CLOC, and the legal operations arm of the Association of Corporate Counsel, or ACC, more legal departments are becoming aware of legal operations functions and demanding the services of legal operations.
Wenzel said the program would be easy enough to have at law schools because it combines a number of programs that are already available on campuses such as business, technology and law.
“There are not a ton of law schools bringing this in as a rapid degree,” Wenzel said. “Vanderbilt has an interesting program.”
Caitlin Moon, director of innovation design for the program in law and innovation at Vanderbilt University Law School, said the program started in 2015. Moon became director of the program last year.
Moon said creating a curriculum for legal operations has not been too difficult. She explained that for decades there have been people doing the work of legal operations, but the function did not have a name. She added it is a slight challenge in keeping up with the ever-changing technology and innovations legal operations professionals are adopting.
“I think this is a prime example of just the world we live in. We are constantly finding new and better ways of working and we've got to figure out ways to identify what those things are and to teach them in a very agile way,” Moon explained.
Vanderbilt Law School is working on a course specifically designated for legal operations. Right now the school offers courses on legal project management, human-centered design for law, legal technology and law as a business.
“That comes closes to what we currently offer that fits squarely within the legal operations bucket,” Moon said of the law as a business course. “That discusses the current state of the legal industry as a business. Then we spend a lot of time on the current opportunities and challenges across the industry.”
And when it comes to legal operations, there is plenty of opportunity and the pay for those opportunities is quite high.
“Salaries for these positions are quite high,” Wenzel said. “It is an incredible valuable and highly leveraged role.”
According to a blog post CLOC published Friday, the average compensation in 2017 for a legal operations professional—including salary, bonuses and stock options—is $163,000. The post further states that respondents who did not lead their legal operations function average $139,000. The data further shows that legal operations professionals with a J.D. degree make an average of 59 percent more than those without one. Those professionals with an MBA make 29 percent more than those with only a bachelor's degree.
Moon said it is only a matter of time before there is a demand for a higher degree in legal operations at law schools.
“If we think about it from the law department standpoint, the GC spends more time focusing on operational issues more than legal issues,” Moon said. “The other value from someone who is going to go to an AM Law 50 or 100 firm, their clients are very concerned with operational issues. So if you understand the operations piece you're much better situated to be an effective counsel.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 2People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 3How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
- 4Bar Report - Dec. 23
- 5Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250