Tech Meets Open Space—and Views—at Cooley's New Hudson Yards Home
"I'm walking around like a kid at Christmas," Cooley CEO Joe Conroy said of his firm's new Manhattan offices.
April 16, 2019 at 05:18 PM
4 minute read
Walking into Cooley's new office at 55 Hudson Yards, it hardly seems like you're walking into a law office at all. A dramatic two-story video wall greets guests as they approach a glass staircase illuminated by floor-to-ceiling windows, framing stunning views of Manhattan atop one of the city's fastest-growing neighborhoods. The 44th floor entrance also happens to be Cooley CEO Joe Conroy's favorite place in the new office. "It's a very dramatic space, and it says Cooley so loudly and clearly," Conroy said. Chatter emanating from the Sidebar café next to the staircase evokes the bustle of a local coffee house more than the sounds of a traditional law firm office. But Cooley has always liked standing out from its law firm rivals. The Silicon Valley firm first entered New York in 2006 through a merger with New York litigation boutique Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman. Since then it has lived in the W. R. Grace Building overlooking Bryant Park in Midtown. But last Monday, more than 250 Cooley attorneys and staff made the move to its new 130,000 square foot home in Hudson Yards. "It's my first day, and I'm walking around like a kid at Christmas," Conroy said. "It's a culmination of a vision that a bunch of us had a while back, and it's really awesome to see." The firm signed a 20-year lease for the space back in 2017 and over the last 18 months has worked to construct a space that was "brand accretive," Conroy said. Cooley is "a brand that has an affinity with entrepreneurship and being on the leading edge of technology," Conroy said. So the idea was to infuse technology throughout the workplace, where everything that you're working on transfers with you from space to space to space, he said. The offices include integrated WiFi connectivity throughout all five floors, including elevators, and they're fitted with touch-screen conference room televisions and "softphone" technology that allows seamless calling from any device. Positioned next to the café is a tech bar where dedicated experts help attorneys and staff with their technological needs, from basic hardware and software issues to advice on getting a Peloton bike in the fitness center working. Following office trends in the legal industry and beyond, the design is also optimized for interaction and collaboration, Conroy said. Cooley has created what it dubs a "hybrid open space concept." Partners can elect to occupy interior closed-door offices with glass walls. Or they can opt for—as Conroy has—attorney suites that are custom designed to give attorneys and staff acoustical and visual privacy in a relatively open floor plan layout. Throughout the offices are "collision points and collaboration spaces" that are meant to encourage "knee to knee" interactions between lawyers, Conroy said. "Some of it sounds sort of cheeky, but when you get on the ground here and you see the way it's actually working ... people are interacting in a different way," he said. The New York office will be the archetype for Cooley's offices going forward. Next up for renovation is the firm's London office, and then San Francisco, where the firm was founded nearly 100 years ago. Hudson Yards is now the largest private real estate development in the U.S. by area and one of the biggest in New York City since Rockefeller Center was completed nearly 80 years ago. With a $25 billion price tag, "the city within a city" has attracted a stream of high-profile tenants, including several Big Law firms. Milbank and Boies Schiller Flexner have already moved into the same building at 55 Hudson Yards. Debevoise & Plimpton has been rumored to be close to signing a deal for a new office in the neighborhood.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250