Venable Posts Financial Gains After Fitzpatrick Deal
The firm continued its run of growth in revenue and partner profits amid a merger with 100-lawyer New York firm Fitzpatrick Cella.
April 18, 2019 at 07:45 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Fresh off its merger with a 100-lawyer New York firm, Venable extended its decade-long run of increases in profits and revenue per lawyer.
Venable, which completed its merger with Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto in November 2018, grew its gross revenue 5.5 percent last year to $570.2 million. The firm increased its total lawyer head count by 3.3 percent and revenue per lawyer ticked up 2.1 percent to $868,000. The equity partnership contracted by 1.2 percent, helping boost profits per equity partner 2.7 percent to $1.165 million.
The firm, with its roots in Baltimore and Washington, D.C., has said the Fitzpatrick deal would add nearly $80 million in revenue, with the combined firm's future projected revenue topping $620 million.
Larry Gesner, co-managing partner of Venable, evaluated the early progress of the combination as “fantastic.” Gesner said the firm is intensely focused on integration, and held a retreat for the combined firm's new lawyers in recent weeks in Baltimore.
Prioritizing the largest combination in firm history has not stopped Venable from pursuing additional growth in other geographical markets. Venable added nine media and entertainment lawyers in Los Angeles last month, including four partners and five associates, all from Kelley Drye & Warren.
Gesner said he expects the firm to continue growing outside its mid-Atlantic roots in the coming year.
“The markets where we are not as big are a little bit easier to grow in, and those are San Francisco and LA and New York, although now we're quite big in New York,” Gesner said, noting the Fitzpatrick combination. “I think we'll continue to grow in those areas.”
Venable's growth in New York was not limited to its Fitzpatrick combination. Gesner noted the addition of Ani Hovanessian, now chair of the firm's New York tax and wealth planning practice, as a particularly significant hire. Hovanessian joined as a partner from Holland & Knight along with Lawrence Mandelker, who joined the group as counsel from Seyfarth Shaw. Together, Gesner said, the duo will build out the firm's New York tax and wealth planning capabilities.
The firm also recruited Guenther Schumacher in New York as chief revenue officer from Ogilvy, an ad agency. Gesner said Schumacher was giving Venable an entirely new perspective on its branding and approach to various markets.
He said the firm's growth in markets outside the mid-Atlantic would not come at the expense of Baltimore and D.C. Venable elected 19 lawyers to its partnership effective April 1, including 12 in Baltimore, Washington and the D.C. suburb of Tysons, Virginia. The firm simultaneously promoted 34 associates to counsel, including seven lawyers in D.C. and Virginia, and seven lawyers in Baltimore.
Venable looked to carefully navigate its expenses last year ahead of the merger, although its nonequity compensation rose nearly 14 percent amid adding a net 13 nonequity partners last year. Gesner said Venable's top expenses are its lawyer cost, then staff, and then rent—in that order. Venable moved into new offices in Washington, D.C., in February 2017, putting it across the street from Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer near Chinatown.
To help offset such expenses, Venable did raise rates. But, Gesner said the firm's rates are “below the median for the Am Law 100.”
Gesner said the firm will continue to focus on the D.C. market, and that its initial concerns have subsided regarding how the market could change after President Donald Trump took office. While various areas of the firm, such as antitrust work, are not “quite as active,” Gesner said, other practices have been very active, including the firm's election law practice, its data security and privacy practices, and its payment processing practice.
“I think the D.C. market continues to be just a great market for lawyers, that's the reason there are so many lawyers here,” Gesner said. “It's competitive obviously, but [it's] just a great market and a continued growth market. As long as the federal government is in business, which we hope will be a long time, I think it'll be a good market for lawyers in D.C.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250