Joe Biden Is Everyman—and That's the Problem
Not only was the presidential candidate's "apology" to Anita Hill unconvincing, but it highlighted how male leaders are essentially clueless about what women deal with in the workplace and the world at large.
April 28, 2019 at 05:20 PM
4 minute read
|
I've been rather agnostic whether it's time for a female president until Joe Biden announced his run for the presidency. Then, all of a sudden, it hit me: I'm done with looking up to old white men.
I didn't expect to make such a blanket statement, but Biden was the tipping point.
He's not a bad guy (though that Average Joe thing doesn't charm everybody), but his recent apology to Anita Hill drove me over the edge. Not only was it unconvincing, but it highlighted how male leaders are essentially clueless about what women deal with in the workplace and the world at large. Simply put: You can't teach old goats new tricks.
First, about that Biden apology to Hill: What's the point of waiting 28 years to say you're sorry? (Biden called Hill a month ago to apologize for the way he mishandled her testimony during the 1991 confirmation hearings for Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court. Then chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Biden allowed Republicans to trash Hill's character—remember how former Utah Senator Orrin Hatch waved a copy of The Exorcist, suggesting that Hill was possessed?—and halted the testimony of other witnesses who were scheduled to corroborate Hill's accusation's of sexual harassment by Thomas.)
And second, didn't it seem tacky for him to finally apologize on the eve of his announcement to run for the presidency? It looks like Biden's contrition has more to do with his political agenda than self-reflection.
You can't blame Hill for not embracing Biden. She told the New York Times, “I cannot be satisfied by simply saying, 'I'm sorry for what happened to you.' ” In that interview, she refused to call Biden's words “ an apology and said she was not convinced that he has taken full responsibility for his conduct at the hearings—or for the harm he caused other victims of sexual harassment and gender violence.”
Indeed, Biden seems to have taken a strangely distant stance in the apology, talking about “what happened to you,” rather than how his actions created consequences.
And on the talk show, The View, in which he appeared after news of the apology came out, Biden again refused to take direct responsibility. At one point Joy Behar said to him about Hill: “I think she wants you to say 'I'm sorry for the way I treated you, not for the way you were treated.' ” But Biden answered: “ But I'm sorry the way she got treated. I never heard—if you go back and look at what I said and I didn't say, I don't think I treated her badly. I took on her opposition.”
While it's probably true that Biden wouldn't have handled the hearings the same way in the post #MeToo era, it's unclear how much he's really learned. Judging from his abstract apologies, including those about his touchy-feely ways, I think there's a limit to his empathy—which is probably why he's that bungling Everyman of his era.
Biden's critics are now saying that he needs to do a more full-throated apology—take responsibility, acknowledge how his actions diminished women who make charges of sexual harassment and enabled the elevation of a Supreme Court justice who's hostile to women's rights.
Hill also told the New York Times: “The focus on apology, to me, is one thing. But he needs to give an apology to the other women and to the American public because we know now how deeply disappointed Americans around the country were about what they saw.”
I say why bother? The apology ship sailed long ago. Biden is who he is–a decent, if inept, leader who doesn't quite get it. He's an anachronism best left by the wayside.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHolland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute read'There Is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250