Who's Getting Left Out as Law Firms Race to Rebrand?
It's natural that law firms overhaul their image to win and keep clients. But experts say recruiting and retaining talent should be key considerations too.
May 01, 2019 at 04:37 PM
3 minute read
Hardly a week goes by lately—sometimes not even a day—without another law firm announcing a rebranding effort, complete with a new website, new logo and often a new, shortened name. Who can blame them for touting their efforts? Firms spend a lot of time and money on market research, branding experts, merchandise and launch parties for clients.
Most firms will say that the rebrand is about the client and what the client wants. And that's no surprise. The client is king in the professional services industry. But some firms may be overlooking other stakeholders in the picture: the talent.
“Marketing and branding should be recruiting's best friend,” said Ross Fishman, a former litigator and current owner of Fishman Marketing. “Some firms just don't realize the full value of their rebrand and how it can help recruiting,” he said.
Fishman said that a rebrand for a midsize firm, for example, might be done for the cost of one headhunter fee and pay for itself multiple times over by attracting the type of talent the firm seeks. He said he thought recruiting and marketing aren't always in sync during rebranding—partly thanks to firms' laser focus on client needs and perception.
“When you are building a brand, or trying to position a brand, you have many different audiences,” said Mary K. Young, a partner at the Zeughauser Group, a legal industry consultancy. “It's everyone who thinks about your firm in any way. Clients are only part of the picture.”
Both Fishman and Young agreed that while focus on client reaction to a rebrand is key, firms can't ignore the message a new brand strategy sends to potential hires—or the reactions of current lawyers and employees.
“A rebrand can have more of an effect on your existing employees than on external parties,” Fishman said.
Young said that other industries that rely heavily on talent have made more of an investment in crafting their image and brand around employees and hiring considerations. She cited the Big Four consulting firms, which have made their presence felt by Big Law both financially and in the fight for talent, as strong examples of this.
Even when investments are made, measuring the impact of branding on different groups may be difficult. Image strategists say a starting point is understanding that there's more to a brand than what clients see when they click on a firm's web page or stroll in the lobby.
“Law firms have a ways to go in understanding what a brand is and isn't,” Young said. “Maybe they think it is just the logo. Or the color. Or the name. But it is about what people think when they see these things.”
|Read More
Rebranding Has Hit the Legal Industry, as Firms Seek the Right Fit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readVersatility and 'Fearlessness' Drive Sullivan & Cromwell's Corporate Practice
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250