Pierce Bainbridge, Ex-Partner Trade Toxic Allegations of Extortion, Misconduct
The accusations in dueling complaints between the firm and ex-partner Donald Lewis range from extortion and defamation to fraud, sexual misconduct and racial discrimination.
May 15, 2019 at 10:27 PM
5 minute read
Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht and its former partner Donald Lewis lodged dueling complaints against each other on Wednesday, with Lewis accusing his old firm of financial improprieties and dismissing him over phony sexual assault claims, and Pierce Bainbridge claiming Lewis tried to extort the firm out of $65 million.
Lewis accused Pierce Bainbridge, its global managing partner John Pierce and other partners and staff of stiffing creditors, inflating the merits of potential cases to trick clients and litigation financiers, and firing him after a sham investigation. Lewis' complaint quotes emails, texts and Slack messages that he said exonerate him and show misconduct by his former colleagues.
In its own suit, Pierce Bainbridge asserts that Lewis was put on leave last year following a staffer's accusation that Lewis grabbed her breasts after she saw him masturbating in a glass-walled office. The firm said Lewis was fired after he violated the terms of his leave by sending a “mass email” to partners that named his accuser and disparaged the people and work of the firm.
Lewis alleges in his complaint that he was placed on leave following “demonstrably false allegations by a junior level employee who was used as a pawn” by firm management. In a statement to ALM, he said: “Virtually every allegation in my complaint is supported by contemporaneous documents. When I learned the firm was a house of cards, and of the deceitful financial conduct by Pierce, I had to speak up. He can insult me all he wants and attempt to create a false narrative[], it does not change what actually happened at Pierce Bainbridge.”
Pierce, in a statement, described Lewis' allegations as a shakedown. “We will not be held up by a disgruntled former employee looking for a payout,” he said. “It seems the defendant has concocted salacious accusations to retaliate for the firm firing him for his own wrongdoing. The firm stands ready to defend its reputation and reveal Mr. Lewis's actions for what they are—outright extortion.”
Pierce Bainbridge, a 2-year-old litigation boutique that has become home to many former Big Law attorneys, said in its suit that Lewis sent a draft complaint to the firm in March packed with obscene and false allegations and demanded $65 million. Lewis later told a partner that he would need at least $3.5 million, and threatened to ”'go on Oprah' to ensure his story received publicity,” the firm alleged.
Lewis, a former Skadden, Arps, Slate Meagher & Flom associate who worked in-house at WeWork before joining Pierce Bainbridge last year, sued the firm in Manhattan Supreme Court on Wednesday. While his complaint had disappeared from state court databases by that evening, Pierce Bainbridge attached it as an exhibit to the complaint it filed against Lewis in Los Angeles County Superior Court the same day.
In his complaint, which the firm said was deleted after having been online for about an hour, Lewis, who is black, accused his former firm of a wide range of misconduct, including fraud, racial discrimination and various common-law claims. It seeks hundreds of millions of dollars in punitive and compensatory damages.
The lengthy complaint, which was signed by lawyer Neal Brickman, describes Pierce as a “con man” and substance abuser who has built his firm “on smoke and mirrors,” and accuses him of making a wide array of misogynistic comments. It depicts some partners and staff at the firm as petty, greedy, and willing to turn a blind eye to misconduct, with some described as making inappropriate remarks about others.
Pierce Bainbridge's complaint accuses Lewis of extortion, defamation and other common-law wrongdoings. It says he “made virtually no meaningful contribution to the firm's development” before he was terminated in November, and that he has made his strategy clear with threats to “ruin” the firm and have it investigated by the Federal Trade Commission.
Brickman, Lewis' lawyer, said Lewis had offered to mediate if Pierce Bainbridge's opening offer had been at least $1 million. He said he filed suit after outside counsel for his adversary failed to commit to such an offer by an 11 a.m. deadline he gave.
In Brickman's account, after opposing counsel indicated shortly afterward that Pierce Bainbridge might work toward an agreement, Brickman went to the New York County e-file clerk, said the complaint was filed “in error” and had it pulled. But after 6 p.m., he said, it became clear that no deal would be reached, something he said underscored Pierce Bainbridge's dishonesty.
“Regarding the allegation of extortion, it is untrue. Virtually every allegation made by Mr. Lewis is supported by documents. His complaint speaks for itself,” Brickman added in an emailed statement.
|Read More
Pierce Bainbridge Marks New Year With New Boston Office, More Hires
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250