How Law Firms Can Better Advance Their Clients' Goals
The best way for law firms to differentiate is to demonstrate that they understand clients' goals and are prepared to help achieve them.
May 24, 2019 at 09:47 AM
5 minute read
Major law firms in the United States should be commended. Despite their clients' hard-fought efforts, these firms appear to be immune from and unscathed by the fundamental rules of supply and demand. Indeed, as the number of major law firms has surged in cities across the United States, and the demand for outside legal services has decreased, billable hourly rates have continued to rise. While this distortion of the basic rules of economics seems to be permanent, like all bubbles it will eventually correct. When it does, law firms, especially Big Law firms, will be under intense pressure to reduce rates. To avoid this result, law firms that want to remain top-tier (and continue to bill at or above their current rates) will need to differentiate themselves from their competitors, and the best way for them to do so is by clearly and convincingly demonstrating to their clients that they understand their goals and, most important, are fully prepared to help advance these goals.
|Know Your Client
While it seems simple, law firms sometimes fail to learn their clients' industries, competitive needs, and the legal and regulatory issues they are facing on a daily basis. This inexcusable ignorance, if unabated, will eventually cost law firms business. To avoid this result, certain required information needs to be continuously reviewed and discussed.
First, if a client is a publicly traded company, its outside counsel, regardless of their practice area, should be reading all of the client's public filings. These filings, whether an annual report, proxy or a periodic 8K, provide a treasure trove of information regarding a client's legal and regulatory issues. From disclosures on pending environmental liabilities to concerns around capital structure to divestment strategy, public filings provide an incredibly helpful overview of a client's legal needs in the coming months and years.
Press releases also provide invaluable insight into a client's activities. At their core, press releases are the most common forum used by a company to shout to the world, “Look at me.” If a company finds an issue, event or accomplishment so important that they want to issue a press release, shouldn't their outside counsel—their most trusted advisers—also be aware of it?
In addition to reading public filings and press releases, a law firm expecting to successfully retain a client should also be aware of the client's advocacy efforts and community activities. If a company is dedicating its scarce time and financial resources to an industry or community initiative, it's probably incredibly important to that company's C-suite and board of directors. And if it's important to this influential constituency, shouldn't a company's outside counsel also consider these matters significant, and possibly support these efforts?
|Know Your Client's Goals
Even if outside counsel know and understand a client's industry and its legal and regulatory needs, this is insufficient to keep and retain the client long-term in today's competitive market. To ensure a multi-year, productive and profitable relationship, outside counsel must also understand why, when and how clients will seek their services, and the only way to find out this pivotal information is by asking questions. All lawyers like to speak, but successful lawyers love to listen.
Asking simple questions—what keeps you up at night or what gaps do you have in your legal department that you typically turn to outside counsel to address—will give outside counsel a clear informational advantage over their peers when competing for work, responding to an RFP, or preparing for a pitch. As any salesperson knows, the secret of any successful business development effort is to talk less and listen more.
|Advance Your Client's Goals
Outside counsel who build and maintain strong relationships with their clients know their fundamental goal is to understand and help alleviate the myriad pressures on their clients. For example, successful outside counsel appreciate that as a cost center, financial certainty is of paramount importance for in-house counsel. As such, any type of surprise, whether financial or otherwise, will never be well received. Therefore, whenever possible, effective outside counsel will always be proactive in providing updates, and informing the client of key deadlines and milestones and options. As the expert who has negotiated more deals or tried more cases than their client, outside counsel always has the responsibility to identify pitfalls, challenges, and where matters may go sideways.
In addition to the company's goals, outside counsel should also be attuned to their client's personal goals. For example, practicing in-house lawyers can sometimes feel isolated from the legal community at large. For this reason, if outside counsel can introduce their clients to each other, the benefits can be two-fold—first, outside counsel is helping their in-house clients network with colleagues in the same industry, and second, a group of people have been brought together who have in common their positive experience with the outside lawyer who brought them together. Another example where outside counsel can assist their individual client's goals is by helping them understand different areas of law. Throughout their career, many in-house lawyers will assume new roles, which may require different skill sets and legal knowledge. If outside counsel can make this transition a little bit smoother by offering their expertise via a continuing legal education presentation or otherwise, this is a favor that will not soon be forgotten.
Andrew C. Gratz is associate general counsel for commercial and strategic transactions at LyondellBasell.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlobal 200 Firms Gaining Deal Share Amid Race to Build in India
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250