Who Is Hispanic? The Careerist Asked. A Reader Responds.
In a recent column, Vivia Chen expressed uncertainty about how to define and report on Hispanic lawyers, prompting a reader to help answer her question.
May 28, 2019 at 11:15 AM
4 minute read
Editor's note: This is a response to a Vivia Chen column titled “Who Is Hispanic?“
I don't mean to be harsh, but from the outset I have to say that the idea that your problem with writing about Hispanic challenges in the legal profession is due to our diversity is, frankly, an easy cop-out. Has the diversity of being black (West Indian, African or African American) or Asian (Chinese, Korean, Taiwanese, etc.) or East Asian (Indonesian, Indian, etc.) ever prevented you from commenting on their issues? No, nor should it. To quote an unnamed recruiter who in their ignorance told you it is a “matter of skin color” which makes commenting difficult for you, do the different shades of black or Asian skin also have the same effect on your writing? No, nor should they.
Now, in fairness, I do not have a magic bright-line definition of Hispanic. None of us do. The definition of Hispanic is one of debate among ourselves. The label—Hispanic, Latino, Latinx—is also debated. Arguably, having a bright-line definition to make a check-off box counter happy is probably not a good idea anyway. Someone is going to be unfairly left out. The Office of Management and Budget in their Federal Register Notice leaves it as a matter of self-identification, writing that “the racial and ethnic categories set forth in the standards should not be interpreted as being primarily biological or genetic in reference. Race and ethnicity may be thought of in terms of social and cultural characteristics as well as ancestry.”
Consider myself. My mother was born in Puerto Rico and my father in Cuba. They met and married in New York. I was in a doctor's office in Harlem, not in a Hispanic country. Further, due to the fact that my older brother is disabled, only English was spoken in our home to make assimilation and growing up easier for him. As a result, my Spanish isn't the best. I'm fair-skinned. Am I not Hispanic? Clearly my peers think so, because I was recently elected as president of a major Hispanic lawyers' organization. You see, despite our internal debates we have few problems recognizing each other.
We are gladdened that you recognize more coverage of our legal community is due, and we wholeheartedly welcome it. Here are some suggestions going forward and how we would like to engage in the process with you.
- Call us. I have no doubt that any leader of the myriad Hispanic Bar organizations in his country would love to engage you in discussion on the topic.
- Meet us. You will find we would be more than happy to sit down with you and then you will see that we come in as many shades—from Blancito to Negro—as can be imagined. We consider that one our greatest strengths and gifts from God, not as a hindrance or a rule for exclusion.
- Join us. In any given month we have scores of events (many announced in ALM publications) where you can come see and hear the incredible panorama of the Hispanic experience.
As a group we look forward to your being part of this exploration and debate with us.
Thomas M. Oliva is president of the Latino Lawyers of Queens County New York, past board member of the Puerto Rican Bar Association, member of the editorial board of the New York Law Journal and is a senior trial attorney at the personal injury firm of Pena & Kahn.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
4 minute readBCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 2Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 3A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
- 4Pa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
- 55th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250