Rethink Law Firm Sales by Shifting Your Perspective
Focusing on your client rather than on your firm will deliver better results for all.
May 31, 2019 at 02:00 PM
6 minute read
Sales can be an off-putting word to many attorneys, but when done right, it can provide a service to clients by helping them solve problems. By shifting your perspective to look at business development from the point of view of the client, not the law firm, you can find more success in expanding your work for clients, while deepening client relationships.
If you've worked as a law firm partner in the past 15 years, chances are you've been asked to make “cross-selling” a focus at some point in your career. If you're in a leadership role, you've probably asked your marketing and business development team to come up with a way to incentivize getting relationship attorneys to expand the portfolio of work they do for their clients by cross-selling. No matter which side of the equation you're on, you've likely found it to be a frustrating experience. Here's how to shift your perspective to an approach that's much more effective.
Solve Problems That Need Solving
There's an inherent problem with any cross-selling initiative: It's firm-focused, and not based on the needs of your clients. That doesn't necessarily mean you're being selfish to attempt it—you may be driven by the deeper level of client service your firm can deliver if you represent the client in multiple areas, or by a wish to create stickier relationships that allow for long-term partnerships with clients. But, ultimately, if you're focusing on what you want to sell, rather than what a client needs to buy, you're looking through the wrong lens.
And yes, I'm using the word sales here. If the word connotes aggressive, pushy salespeople and bad impulse buys of the past for you, it's time to reframe your perspective. Done right, consultative sales is about solving problems that need to be solved, not trying to convince someone to buy something they don't need. That's particularly true in the professional services context, where we are hoping to create long-term relationships, not short-term transactional exchanges.
Think about your own experience as a buyer, whether it's in a consumer or professional services context. You've likely had an experience at one point in your life where you were talked into a purchase you later regretted. Perhaps you got caught up in the moment and let a car salesperson talk you into added features you didn't need. Or you bought a protection plan on a piece of electronics only to later realize the benefits didn't outweigh the cost. In each of those examples, you were sold something based on the salesperson's need to sell it.
Contrast that with an experience where you had a problem that needed to be solved, and a salesperson helped you do so. Perhaps the WiFi signal isn't working effectively in one section of your home. You go to a store and a sales rep listens to what you're struggling with, asks questions about budget, the layout of your house and other factors, and recommends something in your price range that immediately solves the problem. Which situation do you prefer?
What Does That Mean for Law Firms?
Consultative sales is about uncovering needs and helping clients solve problems that should be solved. If you focus on learning what challenges your clients face and actively engage in that dialogue, you can likely uncover any number of ways that you and your firm can assist them now and in the future. Ask lots of questions about the client's interaction with their own internal clients, and the specific pressures that brings to bear. Follow those leads, and you have a receptive path to engage in new work, expanded portfolios and stickier relationships with clients—the goal of all those cross-selling initiatives you've tried in the past. By shifting the perspective from you to them, you can create a buying experience for your client that solves for challenges they need to address. Here are two specific ways you can get started:
- Don't assume, ask. Whether it's a formal client feedback program or an informal approach, if you don't ask, you won't learn. Client feedback programs—whether they're done by the firm itself or an outside vendor—should be able to generate much more information than simply how positively (or not) a client views you. Make sure you're asking questions about business changes and issues, industry pressures, and the strategic goals of the organization. And if you don't have a formal program, make sure you're carving time out at least annually to check in with your key clients at a higher level. Use this time not to give a status update but to talk more broadly about the client's goals in the next six months. Sometimes simply asking, “What keeps you up at night?” can result in the exact roadmap you need to expand your work for your existing clients.
- Know your firm's offerings, or at least how to find them. Now that you're learning more about your clients' needs, you need to match that up with the right solution. Ideally, you know your firm's service offerings well enough to do that. But realistically, as so many of our firms expand and adopt new practice areas, offices and even products, that approach can be challenging. It's a worthwhile investment to spend time getting to know all your firm offers. (Your firm's external website is as helpful to you as your clients in that regard.) But don't hesitate to engage in a thoughtful needs-gathering conversation with your client because you're not confident you can provide the best answer in every situation. Instead, bring all that valuable information you gathered back to your business development team and have them help you identify the right solutions. Tell your client you want to consult with your team on a few potential approaches to solving the challenge at hand, and will circle back the following day.
A New Perspective
Now that you've (hopefully) shifted your perspective to understand the value of a consultative sales approach, you don't need to toss out your cross-selling initiative. Attorneys and business development professionals have come up with a number of clever approaches to incentivizing members of the firm to think outside of their own practice, and that work has value. Simply modify the focus: Rather than introducing a new attorney who specializes in a new area to a client because it's good for the firm, seek out those clients that have identified a need for that service. When you do, you'll see the benefit this can have for your clients—and, ultimately, for you and your firm too.
Lisa Olney leads the marketing and business development team at Littler, the world's largest management-side labor and employment firm. She can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250