Sedgwick Wants $1.6 Million Settlement With Ex-Partners
The defunct firm says the clawback deal will expedite the resolution of Chapter 11 proceedings, but creditors have vowed to fight it.
June 07, 2019 at 05:54 PM
3 minute read
The defunct law firm Sedgwick asked a federal bankruptcy judge Thursday to approve a clawback settlement with 45 former partners who have agreed to return a total of $1.595 million paid to them during the firm's 2017 collapse.
A 27-page filing by the firm's bankruptcy counsel indicates that certain partners who are not part of the settlement might still be vulnerable to breach of fiduciary duty claims.
Still, the firm said that the settlement will expedite the resolution of Chapter 11 proceedings in the Northern District of California, which began in October 2018.
“The debtor believes that further negotiation or active litigation against the settling partners will not increase the cash available for distributions to creditors but will only dissipate cash that could otherwise be used to pay the allowed claims of unsecured creditors,” said Sedgwick's bankruptcy counsel, John Lucas of Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones.
The filing also outlines the San Francisco firm's rocky final year, detailing its unsuccessful efforts to find new merger partners after losing two revenue-generating offices.
The filing stated that it has liabilities of between $10 million and $50 million, much of which consists of unpaid lease obligations. About $9 million of the defunct firm's liabilities are owed through accounts payable. In 2018, Sedgwick was sued by multiple landlords claiming that it failed to pay lease termination fees.
Thursday's filing noted the firm did not collapse through unsustainable guarantees to partners.
“It is important to note that the debtor was not a Dewey, Heller or Brobeck,” it said, referring to other defunct firms. “The firm's former equity partners were not operating under contractual guarantees that required the firm to pay partners fixed compensation without regard to such partners' actual book of business and receivables generated,” it said.
“Nor was the debtor inflating income or profits to ensure that partners would not leave or artificially enhance the firm's ratings,” the filing continued.
It also acknowledged the sacrifices of the partners who stuck around. ”Nearly all of the setting partners remained at the firm throughout 2017, continued to bring in clients, collect receivables and were paid a small fraction of what they were paid in prior years or what they could have been paid at [others] had they left the firm,” the filing said.
The bankruptcy filing by Sedgwick came after the set of former partners on the firm's dissolution committee hit a roadblock in discussions with a group of 12 of the busted firm's largest creditors.
The firm's creditors followed the firm's filing with a motion Thursday indicating that they would dispute the settlement. The creditors asked to convert a previously scheduled hearing June 13 into a scheduling conference for the pending fight.
But the judge in the case said Friday that scheduling and other details will be handled at a hearing now set for July 1.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher Launches in Luxembourg With Hires From A&O Shearman, Clifford Chance
3 minute readA&O Shearman's Former U.S. Co-Chair to Leave Partnership
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250