Want to Be Happy? There's an App for That
A Big Law refugee has created an app to bring compassion to law firms.
June 14, 2019 at 01:56 PM
4 minute read
As a Big Law attorney based in New York, Jeremy Fischbach says he had a front-row seat to a mental health crisis.
“I would say that 95% of the lawyers I knew were unhappy. Two-thirds or more were suffering from isolation, depression or substance abuse,” said Fischbach, who graduated from Princeton University in 2000 with a B.A. in psychology before getting his J.D. from New York University in 2009.
Six years later, Fischbach is a Big Law refugee who practices law in New Orleans, working for the alternative, virtual legal service provider InCloudCounsel. But on the side, he has launched an app designed to help lawyers cope with their mental health issues, offering them a sorely needed compassionate ear—something not easily found at law firms.
The app, appropriately enough, is called “Happy.”
“Happy” connects users with more than 2,000 peers who are trained to be “compassionate listeners,” Fischbach says. It prompts users to specify why they're calling—financial troubles, interpersonal issues, work—and then they are guided to call in and speak with a listener. Calls are confidential and are not recorded, although listeners are often polled to see how the call went and what time of day the call was made. The app is available to everybody, not just attorneys, although Fischbach said several attorneys work as listeners for the company and the six years he spent in Big Law made him realized that lawyers are one group that could most benefit.
“In law firms, you have a high amount of stress and isolation,” Fischbach said. “The mantra is, keep your head down, shut up and keep billing. You're creating a recipe for mental health issues. You're saying we're going to drastically limit the time outside the firm, and, while you're inside, we'll put you in a high-stress environment.”
But emotional connection is a fundamental need, like food, says Fischbach, citing more than a dozen academic studies. And at law firms, where are you going to fulfill that need, he asks, if you spend all day at the office?
According to Fischbach's data, users report a 49% decrease in stress and anxiety, and 93% of users say they felt happier after a conversation with a listener. Some experts have criticized the app as potentially harmful, as listeners have little formal training. But Fischbach said the company has a stringent vetting process and negative ratings quickly sift out poor listeners.
The idea for Happy first came together in 2016, and after spending much of 2017 building out the technology and recruiting support providers, the app went live in 2018.
One year after Happy's release, the company has already partnered with the American Heart Association and with the insurance companies Aetna and United Healthcare. Fischbach now has his eye on the market that inspired him to create the app in the first place: law firms.
He says he has had ”encouraging conversations” with several firms that want to roll out the app firmwide, although he would not specify which firms. He also says his app will be a practical option for attorneys who won't take time out of their day for an appointment with a mental health professional, or who are worried about the repercussions of seeking help.
Additionally, he says “Happy” could train attorneys to be more empathetic listeners so that they can better support their colleagues.
“Our call volume actually goes up at night when other options are less available,” he said. “And talking to peers—everyday people—does a lot to reduce stigma, which is a huge obstacle.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250