Paul Hastings Boosts Parental Leave for Lawyers and Staff
The new policy follows moves by other large firms to offer more generous and inclusive leave for new parents.
June 18, 2019 at 04:08 PM
3 minute read
Paul Hastings is the latest firm to expand its parental leave policy, now offering 14 weeks of paid leave to all attorneys and staff.
Under the new policy, birthing parents will also be entitled to an additional eight weeks of childbirth recovery, raising their total leave to 22 weeks.
“This policy is a key example of our continued commitment to provide support and flexibility for all of our working parents, during one of the most significant moments of their lives,” Greg Nitzkowski, managing partner of Paul Hastings and co-chair of the firm's diversity committee, said in a statement. “An inclusive culture allows all of our people to thrive personally and professionally, making us stronger for our clients and each other,” he added.
Birthing parents are free to use paid leave time at any point during the course of a pregnancy. All parents are free to use their paid leave all at once, or intermittently within a year of a birth, adoption or foster placement.
The new policy goes into effect July 1.
Previously, attorneys and staff at Paul Hastings received disparate benefits. Among attorneys, birthing parents were entitled to 18 weeks of paid leave, while nonbirthing parents could receive six weeks, plus an additional four weeks for primary caregivers. Staff, meanwhile, were entitled to 12 weeks for birthing parents and six weeks for nonbirthing parents.
The new policy is in line with some of the other recent enhancements to parental leave implemented by large firms.
In November, Fried Frank announced that it would grant 12 weeks of parental leave to all attorneys and staff, with birthing mothers also entitled to 10 additional weeks of paid disability leave.
Dechert's expanded policy is similar: 12 weeks of paid leave for all employees regardless of gender, with an additional eight weeks paid for birthing mothers.
When Barnes & Thornburg expanded its policy at the beginning of 2019, it made all attorneys and staff eligible for 16 weeks of parental leave, but did not offer any additional leave for birthing mothers.
Fenwick & West remains on the more generous side of things. Its current policy, unveiled in November, offers 16 weeks of paid leave for its attorneys and professional staff, regardless of gender or caregiver status. Birthing mothers get at least six additional weeks of fully paid pregnancy disability leave. Depending on the timing of the pregnancy-related disability, the amount of paid leave could be as high as 29 weeks.
The upper limit, set by Susman Godfrey, will be hard to surpass. In October, the firm announced it would provide unlimited paid parental leave to its associates, regardless of gender or caregiver status. The hours are be annualized for bonus purposes of up to 18 weeks for women who give birth and up to 12 weeks for any associate.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250