Amazon Attorney Tags On to Jones Day Gender Bias Suit
Four female former associates have now put their names to claims of discrimination against the firm. The latest is the first to have worked in the firm's New York office.
June 21, 2019 at 02:27 PM
3 minute read
The federal gender bias class action suit against Jones Day is slowly accumulating more named plaintiffs as former associates opt in to claims asserting systematic pay disparities.
After six plaintiffs, two named and four proceeding anonymously, detailed what they alleged to be a frat-house environment at the law firm and a compensation system that undervalues women, additional former associates are attaching their names to the action.
An attorney for Amazon's television production arm on Friday followed a Facebook product counsel in joining the collective action component of the suit, which asserts that Jones Day violated the Equal Pay Act by paying female attorneys less than male attorneys.
Unlike the two named plaintiffs and two of the anonymous plaintiffs behind the April complaint, Katrina Henderson did not practice in Jones Day's California offices. According to her LinkedIn profile and state bar records, she was an associate at the firm's New York office from October 2013 to July 2016 before joining Pixar Animation Studios in August 2016. Earlier this month, she moved from Pixar to Amazon Studios in Santa Monica, California.
Earlier in June, current Facebook product counsel Jessica Jardine Wilkes became the first former associate to opt in to the proposed Equal Pay Act collective action. Hundreds of former and current female associates across the firm could ultimately elect to opt in.
Lawyers at Sanford Heisler and Jones Day argued in Washington, D.C., federal district court last month over whether the unidentified women should be able to keep their anonymity in advance of any trial. In a more recent filing, one of the Jane Doe plaintiffs, noting she was up against one of the most powerful law firms in the world, analogized her position to that of a whistleblower.
The proposed class action seeks as much as $200 million from Jones Day for what the plaintiffs allege was systematic discrimination against women attorneys. Jones Day has countered that it has a strong record of advancing women's careers, calling the lawsuit meritless.
An attorney at Sanford Heisler declined to comment Friday.
A separate gender bias suit against Jones Day recently came to an end, as a spokesman for the firm said Monday that former partner Wendy Moore had dropped all claims against the firm in exchange for the return of her capital contribution.
Note: This story has been updated to clarify that two former associates have opted in to a proposed Equal Pay Act collective action, not come forward as named plaintiffs in the proposed federal class action component of the Jones Day case.
|Read More
Associates Assail 'Fraternity Culture' at Jones Day in $200M Sex Bias Suit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250