Against a Tidal Wave, Law Firms Fight for Reproductive Rights
Am Law 200 firms have stepped up in the wake of a sudden surge of new legislation limiting access to abortion and related care.
June 26, 2019 at 05:30 AM
4 minute read
If it started as a trickle, it's turned into a flood. New laws limiting abortion rights have been spreading throughout the country, and law firms have responded by channeling their pro bono resources into the fight against them.
Shannon Rose Selden, a partner at Debevoise & Plimpton who leads the firm's asset management litigation practice, says the current moment represents a “sea change” in the volume and nature of the new laws.
“The laws restricting access to abortion are fundamentally not about abortion but are about equality and dignity and respect for women and girls in this country,” Selden says. “I don't want to live in a country where that is not something that is important to us and is not something that we protect.”
In an effort to offer protection, Selden and her Debevoise colleagues have poured thousands of hours of pro bono work into litigation challenging the wave of legislation. Alongside the Center for Reproductive Rights, the firm is battling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to overturn a law whose burdensome regulations have led three-quarters of clinics in Louisiana to close, Selden says. The suit has twice survived the state's motions to dismiss.
Debevoise isn't alone among Big Law firms getting involved in the push for reproductive rights.
Orrick represents Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky in a case in the Sixth Circuit challenging a Kentucky law that would have closed the last clinic in the state. Karen Johnson-McKewan, a San Francisco-based patent partner at the firm, served as lead trial counsel in the Western District of Kentucky, which found the law unconstitutional. Despite the controversial nature of the issue, Orrick, Debevoise and others have proudly stepped in to offer assistance to the nonprofits on the “front lines,” as Johnson-McKewan says.
“I won't say that there's nobody in the firm who disagrees with our taking the case. There were some people who really did not feel good about it, and I have nothing but respect for their views,” Johnson-McKewan says. “But this is a constitutional right, and we're lawyers, and we have an obligation to give back to our communities. I couldn't think of a more appropriate place for us to spend our resources.”
Johnson-McKewan says she's spoken with colleagues at other law firms about how they can best support the organizations at the center of lawsuits opposing new restrictions, and she's also heard from some clients and in-house lawyers who want to offer their hand. But she acknowledges that law firms can't simply step in and save the day.
In the meantime, law firms continue to play their part. Morrison & Foerster helped ensure that a Texas law forcing the cremation of fetal remains was struck down in district court last year, and the firm also secured a $200,000 contempt fine against an anti-abortion activist who attempted to use covert videos to threaten abortion providers. And Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison won a Mississippi district court ruling last November striking down a 15-week abortion ban.
“These laws are being passed with such rapidity around the country. There's a danger of feeling swamped and overwhelmed by them all,” Johnson-McKewan says.
Nonetheless, she says the lawyers and organizations involved in the fight are galvanized, and law firms will continue to help where they can.
In addition to the Louisiana litigation, Selden says Debevoise has a hand in amicus briefings at the U.S. Supreme Court and eight different circuit courts on behalf of a variety of medical organizations. The support is representative of the important role large law firms have in fighting to preserve human rights, she says.
“Even though I have a very busy practice that is revenue-generating, nobody has ever said, 'Look, you should spend less time on that and more on your paying clients,'” Selden says. “It's something that we celebrate, because it's important. It's a fight about justice and women's rights, and that's clearly where our interests lie.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMilbank’s Revenue and Profits Surge Following Demand Increases Across the Board
4 minute readFourth Quarter Growth in Demand and Worked Rates Coincided with Countercyclical Dip, New Report Indicates
Orrick Picks Up 13-Lawyer Tech, VC Group From Gunderson Dettmer
Saul Ewing Loses Two Partners to Fox Rothschild, Marking Four Fla. Partner Exits in Last 13 Months
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Jury Awards $3M in Shooting at Nightclub
- 2How Clean Is the Clean Slate Act?
- 3Florida Bar Sues Miami Attorney for Frivolous Lawsuits
- 4Donald Trump Serves Only De Facto and Not De Jure: A Status That Voids His Acts Usurping the Power of Congress or the Courts
- 5Georgia Hacker Pleads Guilty in SEC X Account Scam That Moved Markets
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250