Fintech Partners Are in High Demand as Practice Heats Up
Law firm hiring in financial technology practices is booming in 2019, with no slowdown in sight.
June 26, 2019 at 03:50 PM
5 minute read
Pouncing on a growing business opportunity, law firms are expanding their financial technology-related practices and snapping up attorneys with relevant expertise.
Since the beginning of 2019, at least 26 lawyers with some fintech expertise have joined Am Law 200 firms as partners, according to ALM data. That's on top of a similarly high pace of fintech partner hires during the first six months of last year and appears to be higher than the number of fintech partner moves in the first halves of 2016 and 2017.
The increased demand for fintech expertise comes from both law firm clients in banking looking to go digital as well as from technology companies, such as payment apps, said Jon Truster, the co-head of lateral partner placement at Greene Levin Snyder. “I've heard from firms that they expect this to be a growth area,” Truster said.
As a result of the client interest, law firm demand for lawyers with fintech experience or to work on fintech teams has increased during the last three to four years, according to Jeff Lowe, the global practice leader of Major, Lindsey & Africa's law firm practice group.
Fintech is “nascent but growing, and a really great area for young lawyers,” Lowe said. “It's here to stay.”
So far this year, prominent fintech moves include Vivian Maese joining Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft in New York from Latham & Watkins, which later added two prominent fintech partners, Mitchell Rabinowitz and Jenny Cieplak in Washington, D.C., from Crowell & Moring. Reed Smith brought on New York-based Christine Trent Parker, formerly special counsel at Sullivan & Cromwell; Hunton Andrews Kurth added Erin Fonté in Austin from Dykema Gossett, while Matthew Kluchenek joined Mayer Brown in Chicago from Baker McKenzie.
|'Not a Fad'
Bitcoin, blockchain technology, smartphone payment apps and other forms of financial technology have risen to prominence in recent years. But the fintech industry has actually been around for more than two decades, according to Maese, who started her career as a lawyer on Wall Street. She said she classifies ATMs and early trading-floor applications on the New York Stock Exchange as early examples, and the fintech industry is currently in its “second wave.”
“The first wave was technology pushing its way from the back-office to front-office operations,” she said. “Much of the activity is now in the front office: technology changes how we see information and interact with customers. There's more capability in the technology and less human touch necessary.”
The financial services industry 10 years ago was 90% driven by tech, she said. “In the next decade, it will be 99%. It's not a fad. It's a fundamental change to an important industry in the world. That's why everyone is gearing up for it,” Maese added.
Justin Steffen, who moved in January from Jenner & Block to Ice Miller, has also observed higher demand in the legal industry for fintech expertise, especially in the last couple of years.
Steffen, who teaches a fintech law class at Loyola University Chicago School of Law, said while he considers fintech to be a broad term including “anyone who deals with money and does so with new or interesting technology,” it's only in the last year or so he has seen a few law schools specifically teach that application of the law. For instance, spring 2019 was the first semester Loyola offered the class, he said.
“It has moved from a novelty to an actual, legitimate practice,” he said.
Right now, much of the demand is for regulatory and transactional work, Lowe and other recruiters said. They, along with fintech partners who joined new firms this year, said there is also demand for attorneys with broad expertise in multiple areas that complement financial technology, such as intellectual property, compliance, finance and data privacy.
For example, Steffen, a litigator, became passionate about fintech on his own time. In the coming years, he said he expects his litigation expertise paired with his fintech passion will become more valuable to clients. ”You need to have a lot of different disciplines, because issues aren't necessarily housed in one sort of space,” he said.
Maese said that because fintech touches so many practice areas, expanding services in this industry is a chance for law firms to encourage more internal collaboration and teamwork.
“It becomes essential for lawyers to have a platform that can do all these things,” she said. “You can't stand in a silo and do fintech properly.”
The potential for high internal collaboration—and billing—on fintech issues among multiple practice areas makes it particularly appealing to law firms. Truster, the partner recruiter, also noted that fintech matters can extend into lending, accessing money and regulatory issues. “It's pretty broad,” he said. “I do think it's a moneymaker for firms and will continue to be.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250