Separation Anxiety: Lawyers Were Spurred to Action in the Family Reunification Fight
Lawyers from throughout the Am Law 200 stepped up to help bring families back together in 2018.
June 26, 2019 at 05:30 AM
4 minute read
Thomas Turner likes to joke that he hasn't been in a courtroom since the day he was sworn in, but last June he had a good reason to return.
As a transactional lawyer at Miller Canfield in Detroit, Turner was an unlikely option to step into the fray to help an undocumented immigrant gain release from detention and reunite with her son. In times of crisis, though, any help is welcome. Like many lawyers, he was upset to see families being separated at the U.S.-Mexico border, and offered a hand.
Turner took on a referral from the Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network and helped his client get a bond set and secured so that she could leave detention in Colorado, locate her 13-year-old son and be reunited with him in Louisiana. As family separations and detentions at the border became headline news last summer, he was part of a flood of lawyers at large law firms rushing in to help.
“So often you read these headlines and you feel helpless, like there are these big systems and they're faceless and nameless and they march in a certain direction. To be able to step in and help someone in this situation was an excellent gift,” Turner says. “This was definitely the most personal case I've ever worked on. I threw myself into it completely.”
He wasn't alone. Numerous firms detailed their work on family reunification in The American Lawyer's Pro Bono Survey.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison secured the release of seven parents from detention centers, and led a team of law firms that helped nearly 200 children reunite with their parents. Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer helped secure a settlement with the Trump administration to allow 2,700 children to travel to the United States to reunite with their parents after the administration attempted to rescind their approval under the Central American Minors program. Others, including at Mayer Brown, DLA Piper, Squire Patton Boggs and Blank Rome, stepped in to help bring families back together.
“I've heard attorneys say, 'It was keeping me up at night and I just wanted to do something, so I came in the next day and called the pro bono team,'” says Lucy McMillan, a senior attorney for pro bono at Arnold & Porter.
And with so many lawyers throughout the industry eager to help, firms have been working together to put more weight behind their work.
“The collaboration I have seen among law firms, legal services organizations and policy people—it's been really heartwarming how many people want to work together, that there's so much strategy going on to determine how best to use resources,” McMillan says.
At Shearman & Sterling, which addressed the crisis from several angles, collaboration was key. The firm worked with organizations including the Immigration Justice Campaign to interview detained parents from Texas to New York about their circumstances and fought to get families reunited, putting in thousands of hours of pro bono time.
As Saralyn Cohen, Shearman's pro bono director, sees it, immigration law is well situated to draw attention from around Big Law. Because it's a federal, rather than state, issue, with significant training opportunities and resources available for those interested in contributing their time, it's perfectly suited for an outpouring of support from around the country. Cohen's colleague, Emily Griffen, litigation counsel at the firm, was one of many who felt the need to step in.
“In reading about the issue and watching the news on TV, I absolutely knew that I had to use my skills and resources to do something to help separated families,” Griffen says.
Turner, who was sparked in the same way, knows he's unlikely to handle another case quite like the one he took on last summer, even if he does make it back to the courtroom. He was proud to play “a very small role” in making someone's life tangibly better, he says.
“It was one of the best days of my legal career,” he says, “without question.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome': DOJ Proposes Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250