CFOs Fueling Rise of Litigation Finance, Survey Says
A new report from Burford Capital finds that financial executives at the largest companies are especially open to third-party litigation funding.
June 27, 2019 at 06:00 AM
3 minute read
As litigation finance continues its passage into the mainstream of legal practice, CFOs deserve some of the credit.
Burford Capital spoke with over 500 CFOs and senior finance professionals in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. for a new report and found that two-thirds of them were ”very likely” to use litigation finance in the next two years.
Financial executives at bigger companies showed themselves to be even more open to using litigation finance, with 57.9% of CFOs at companies with revenues over $1 billion saying they were very likely to do so in the near future, compared with 34.3% at companies grossing less than $1 billion.
It's a sign that litigation finance isn't just for David versus Goliath matters any longer.
“Contrary to most people's intuition, the bigger the corporation, the more the CFO values the benefits that using legal capital can bring,” said David Perla, a managing director at Burford, which bills itself as the world's largest publicly traded litigation funder.
While over three-quarters of these CFOs and senior finance professionals said their companies had unenforced judgments valued at over $10 million, 63% of respondents said that they've chosen to pass on claims due to the impact of legal expenses on their bottom line.
The awareness that they have left a lucrative financial resource on the table makes them open to employing a new tool to unlock the value of these resources.
“CFOs at these large companies can look at these complex situations and understand how legal can be used as a financial asset just as inventory, real estate, or human capital can be used,” Perla said.
There's another factor on the horizon that suggests the appetite among CFOs for third party financing is likely to grow.
Roughly two-thirds of the individuals surveyed by Burford said that they would advocate a reduction of their legal budget, if the economy enters into a recession. A slightly larger majority said that would push them to increase their use of litigation finance.
“As the economy slows down, legal departments are going to be asked to do more with less,” said Perla, who recalled asking law firms to slash their fees by 10% as an associate general counsel with Monster.com during the early 2000's recession.
One way to do so is to use litigation finance to enforce judgments that are essentially sitting around, and using the returns to support existing operations.
“Yes, you'll give away some of the back end, but you'll have more to work with,” Perla said. “That's the sort of solution a CFO loves to hear.”
|Read More
Is Litigation Financing the Next Big Thing for Legal Departments?
Why Arbitration Finance Will Become More Popular in 2019
Five Predictions for Litigation Finance in 2019
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCovington, Steptoe Form New Groups Amid Demand in Regulatory, Enforcement Space
4 minute readConsumer Finance Law Enforcer Takes Private Practice Job at Morgan Lewis
With 'Fractional' C-Suite Advisers, Midsize Firms Balance Expertise With Expense
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 2For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 3As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 4General Warrants and ESI
- 5GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250