CFOs Fueling Rise of Litigation Finance, Survey Says
A new report from Burford Capital finds that financial executives at the largest companies are especially open to third-party litigation funding.
June 27, 2019 at 06:00 AM
3 minute read
As litigation finance continues its passage into the mainstream of legal practice, CFOs deserve some of the credit.
Burford Capital spoke with over 500 CFOs and senior finance professionals in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. for a new report and found that two-thirds of them were ”very likely” to use litigation finance in the next two years.
Financial executives at bigger companies showed themselves to be even more open to using litigation finance, with 57.9% of CFOs at companies with revenues over $1 billion saying they were very likely to do so in the near future, compared with 34.3% at companies grossing less than $1 billion.
It's a sign that litigation finance isn't just for David versus Goliath matters any longer.
“Contrary to most people's intuition, the bigger the corporation, the more the CFO values the benefits that using legal capital can bring,” said David Perla, a managing director at Burford, which bills itself as the world's largest publicly traded litigation funder.
While over three-quarters of these CFOs and senior finance professionals said their companies had unenforced judgments valued at over $10 million, 63% of respondents said that they've chosen to pass on claims due to the impact of legal expenses on their bottom line.
The awareness that they have left a lucrative financial resource on the table makes them open to employing a new tool to unlock the value of these resources.
“CFOs at these large companies can look at these complex situations and understand how legal can be used as a financial asset just as inventory, real estate, or human capital can be used,” Perla said.
There's another factor on the horizon that suggests the appetite among CFOs for third party financing is likely to grow.
Roughly two-thirds of the individuals surveyed by Burford said that they would advocate a reduction of their legal budget, if the economy enters into a recession. A slightly larger majority said that would push them to increase their use of litigation finance.
“As the economy slows down, legal departments are going to be asked to do more with less,” said Perla, who recalled asking law firms to slash their fees by 10% as an associate general counsel with Monster.com during the early 2000's recession.
One way to do so is to use litigation finance to enforce judgments that are essentially sitting around, and using the returns to support existing operations.
“Yes, you'll give away some of the back end, but you'll have more to work with,” Perla said. “That's the sort of solution a CFO loves to hear.”
Read More
Is Litigation Financing the Next Big Thing for Legal Departments?
Why Arbitration Finance Will Become More Popular in 2019
Five Predictions for Litigation Finance in 2019
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCovington, Steptoe Form New Groups Amid Demand in Regulatory, Enforcement Space
4 minute readConsumer Finance Law Enforcer Takes Private Practice Job at Morgan Lewis
With 'Fractional' C-Suite Advisers, Midsize Firms Balance Expertise With Expense
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 2Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 3As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
- 4The Gold Standard: Remembering Judge Jeffrey Alker Meyer
- 5NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250