Law Firm Mergers Hit the Doldrums—for Now
The pace of mergers slowed in the first half of 2019—and the deals were smaller—compared with the same timeframe last year.
June 28, 2019 at 03:20 PM
3 minute read
Driven by a slowdown in completed mergers in the second quarter, law firm mergers in the first half of 2019 are lagging behind the same period last year, according to data collected by law firm consultancies Fairfax Associates and Altman Weil.
Fairfax recorded just five completed mergers in the second quarter of 2019, bringing its count for the first half of this year to 30. In the first half of last year, it counted 37 completed mergers in the same time period. Fairfax uses published reports, press releases and direct reports from law firms to collect data when the acquired firm has five or more partners.
Law firm mergers so far this year have also been notably smaller than the mega-mergers of recent years. Three of the five combinations Fairfax tracked in the last quarter involved firms with fewer than 10 lawyers each. The two larger deals both involved global behemoth Dentons gobbling up a smaller overseas firm.
Altman Weil, which tracks merger announcements and news reports rather than completed deals, has counted 45 mergers so far in 2019. That figure includes just three U.S. mergers involving an acquired firm larger than 10 lawyers, however, and just one where the acquired firm was larger than 20 lawyers. Twenty-eight of the deals in Altman's data set involve firms acquiring small shops of five lawyers or fewer.
In contrast, last year Altman Weil tracked six mergers involving acquired firms with more than 100 lawyers, and 15 deals where the acquired firm had 21 to 100 lawyers.
While second-quarter totals are down compared to last year, Fairfax Associates principal Kristin Stark said the numbers don't reflect the many merger discussions in which her firm's clients are engaging.
“The interesting part about the second-quarter data is that it's a bit in contrast to our actual experience right now,” she said. “One of the themes here is that the data is simply not reflective of the reality of how many firms are talking about mergers.”
Stark added that it was unusual to see so many more mergers completed in the first quarter than in the second—25 compared with five—and that in other years those deals have been more spread out. Still, she said that based on the discussions Fairfax's clients have been engaging in, she still expects the 2019 totals to be comparable to last year, when mergers hit a 20-year high.
Fairfax found that although there were fewer completed mergers in the first half of this year compared with last year, the 2019 count so far is close to its 10-year average count of 31 mergers.
Three combinations are scheduled to be completed by the end of 2019, said Fairfax: Foster Pepper and Garvey Schubert Barer will create a six-office, 180-lawyer firm named Foster Garvey in September; Greenberg Traurig will merge with Italian firm Santa Maria Studio Legale in July; and Dentons and MawereSibanda will combine 21 lawyers in Zimbabwe.
Meanwhile, talks are continuing between West Coast-based O'Melveny & Myers and U.K. Magic Circle firm Allen & Overy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250