No Joke: Susman Godfrey's Unlimited Paid Parental Leave Bears Dividends
Associates who've already opted to take extended leave said it was key that men as well as women embrace the policy.
July 02, 2019 at 03:45 PM
4 minute read
Image: Shutterstock
It's now been nine months since Susman Godfrey eclipsed other law firm parental leave policies with an announcement that all lawyers could take unlimited leave to bear and care for their young children.
Other law firms continue to roll out new gender-neutral policies that also feature more generous leave. On Monday, Kelley Drye & Warren became the latest, providing paid child care leave of up to eight weeks and childbirth and recovery leave of up to 20 weeks.
But no other firms have matched Houston-based national litigation firm Susman Godfrey, which has also exceeded the scale set by Cravath, Swaine & Moore for Big Law associate salaries and bonuses.
“Our goal was to allow associates, male and female, to decide what's right for them and their families in terms of leave and to allow them to do that without any restrictions from the firm,” said managing partner Neal Manne.
In addition to being paid full salaries for as long as they wish to take leave, all new parents have their full bonuses protected for 12 weeks, and 18 weeks for mothers who give birth.
Manne said that he initially expected more associates would avail themselves of leave and that they would seek more time. Both have been borne out.
“It doesn't really affect the number of women taking leave. Women were always taking maternity leave. It does affect the amount of leave they're taking. That amount has crept up,” he said. “On the male side, we're seeing the biggest change.”
Manne said the change was accompanied by some messaging that aimed to make clear to male associates that the new policy was “not a joke.” The overall success of the initiative depended on men taking ample advantage of leave so that women did not feel constrained to limit their own absences, he said.
“When they see males taking off, not just with approval but with encouragement, they understand that our policy is real,” Manne added.
Los Angeles associate Krysta Pachman, who is currently on leave with her second child, offered support to Manne's assessment. She took 16 weeks of paid leave, the maximum at the time, when her son was born; this time she expects to use 20 weeks and return to the office after Labor Day. Knowing that her male colleagues were taking generous leave helped quell any doubts about being gone for that long.
“I think that's the most impactful part of the policy in terms of making women feel comfortable and taking whatever time they need,” she said.
Seattle associate John Schiltz, who also had a child under the two different regimes, has heard similar sentiments. He took the maximum of four weeks available to fathers when his son was born. When the firm changed its policy a week before he was scheduled to return to work after his daughter was born, he elected to take two more months away after spending a month back in the office.
“I don't want to speak for my female colleagues, but I've heard from some of them that they really valued I took as much time as I could. In a way it makes them more comfortable doing that as well,” he said. “It's not a female associate reality, it's an associate reality.”
Together, they depict a firm culture that appears diametrically opposed to the depictions in recent law suits targeting Morrison & Foerster and Jones Day, where women who returned from maternity leave allegedly found their work environment changed dramatically.
“The firm is extremely supportive of working mothers. I've seen that right through my first pregnancy and coming back to work,” Pachman said. “It's a firm that's committed to helping women meet personal goals as well as professional goals.”
Read More
Paul Hastings Boosts Parental Leave for Lawyers and Staff
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year' White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/03/Heather-McDevitt-767x633.jpg)
White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'
6 minute read![Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/11/67/f75a9f5d46b08088f1ca60a48425/karp-clement-barr-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism
4 minute read![Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024 Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2023/01/Snapchat-App-004-767x633.jpg)
![Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/03/Jones-Day-sign-01-767x633.jpg)
Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250