How Bruce Rogow, a Former Civil Rights Attorney, Came to Represent Roger Stone
Rogow cut his teeth as a young attorney representing civil rights activists in the deep South and helped set a U.S. Supreme Court precedent for indigent defendants. So how did he end up representing Roger Stone?
July 08, 2019 at 05:30 AM
7 minute read
Few in the legal community doubt Florida attorney Bruce Rogow's prowess and integrity. He cut his teeth as a civil rights lawyer in Mississippi in the 1960s, providing legal assistance to the flood of civil rights workers trying to end segregation in the deep South. He then dedicated himself to helping the poor, becoming assistant director of Greater Miami Legal Services.
Since then, he's become a well-known First Amendment and constitutional lawyer, arguing 11 times before the U.S. Supreme Court — more than any other Florida attorney. He also has been counsel in scores of cases at the Florida Supreme Court and has argued more than 450 civil and criminal cases in federal and state appellate courts.
But Rogow is now in the limelight as the lawyer representing longtime Republican operative and staunch Donald Trump ally Roger Stone.
Stone, who was arrested in January at his Fort Lauderdale home in connection with Special Counsel Robert Mueller III's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, is facing charges of witness tampering, obstructing an official proceeding, and five counts of making false statements.
The path from civil rights attorney in the deep South to defender of a Republican Party political operative is on its face an unconventional trajectory. But to the 79-year-old Rogow, there is little difference between defending civil rights activists in Mississippi and his current work for Stone.
“People are worthy of a defense, especially when their liberty is on the line,” he said.
Even as Stone faces a finding of contempt for allegedly breaking his gag order, originally instituted for an Instagram post featuring the presiding judge next to the apparent crosshairs of a rifle scope, Rogow stands by him. He compares Stone's cultural radioactivity to another one of his high-profile controversial clients: Alan Dershowitz. The retired Harvard law professor was involved in a cadre of suits and countersuits stemming from claims related to former client Jeffery Epstein's sex crimes investigation, including allegations linking Dershowitz to the underage sex scandal.
“Did Alan Dershowitz do anything that suggested to me that I should not represent him? The answer is absolutely not. The same thing with Roger Stone,” Rogow said. ”Each, in their very distinctive ways, is a mensch — a good person.”
Rogow, who was a law professor for 40 years at Nova Law School in Fort Lauderdale, and later dean, admits he has a sort of magnetism for outsized characters. During his 55 years as an attorney, he has represented rap artist Luther Campbell, also known as Uncle Luke, from 2 Live Crew; Seminole Tribe Chief James Billie, a former alligator wrestler who built the Seminole Tribe into a major business enterprise; Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke; and Trump.
He also has handled several cases for the president's loose network of companies, including some that arose from club membership and vendor disputes. In 2017, for example, he took on the appeal for Trump in litigation against a Trump-supporting Florida painter who had won $300,000 in reimbursement and damages after the Trump Organization failed to pay for a golf course renovation. Rogow lost the appeal.
Despite his defense of controversial clients, Rogow is near-universally revered in Florida.
“He is the most strategic, wisest, thoughtful and ethical lawyer I have ever met in my entire career,” said Bobby Gilbert, a name partner at Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert in South Florida. Gilbert has worked closely with Rogow for more than 20 years, most notably on a series of class actions against banks for predatory overdraft fees that fetched a total of $1.2 billion.
Ira Leesfield, a Miami attorney and staple of Florida Democratic politics, had a similar take.
“I just have a world of respect for him. Bruce is one of a kind,” he said.
At a time when the American Civil Liberties Union is under attack for continuing its policy of defending hate groups, and a Harvard professor, Ron Sullivan, has been criticized for representing former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, Rogow's legacy is that of a steadfast purist: someone who believes that who you represent is not who you are; that every person, no matter how unpopular or vile, deserves a vigorous defense.
|Intolerance
In Rogow's modest Fort Lauderdale office — for years he's shared a desk with his associate — a framed New York Times article dated June 12, 1972, and headlined “High Court Bars Any Jail Sentence Without Counsel,” chronicles the decision on Rogow's first U.S. Supreme Court case, Argersinger v. Hamlin, which held that defendants, even those facing misdemeanor charges, have the right to counsel when the crime they are charged with carries a penalty of possible imprisonment. His office is festooned with similar displays.
Rogow said he'll never forget the first time he rode the elevator at the Supreme Court, flanked by the U.S. solicitor general, deputy solicitor and his mother, who raised him by herself.
“My mother is standing behind me and she grabs my hand,” Rogow said. “And to this assembled crowd she says, 'Brucie's hand is wet just like it was before his bar mitzvah.'”
A framed multicolored Native American dress represents his work for the Seminole Tribe of Florida in a lawsuit against the state of Florida, which opened up gaming on Indian reservations in 1996.
“My daughter used to wear the dress when she was little,” Rogow said as he stooped to gaze at the frame.
Rogow has long endured criticism for representing certain clients — even from those close to him.
“My wife Jacquelyn didn't like it when I represented 2 Live Crew and what their songs represent: the misogyny, the language,” said Rogow, referencing his representation of the South Florida rap group who ran into trouble for its 1990 album “As Nasty As They Wanna Be,” featuring track names such as “Me So Horny,” “The F*ck Shop” and “Dirty Nursery Rhymes.”
His wife, who was a member of the Audubon Society, also wasn't a fan of another client: Seminole Chief James Billie, who shot and killed an endangered Florida Panther. Rogow said his wife, also an attorney, did come around after she met 2 Live Crew's Luther Campbell and Chief Billie.
But when he represented a group of Nazis in Miami Beach who had been arrested for violating an anti-swastika ordinance, one of the circuit judges told Rogow, who is Jewish, that he was a “disgrace to his race,” and that the Nazis “should be lined up against the wall and shot.”
“I said, 'Judge, that's what they want to do to us,' ” Rogow said.
Even now, representing Stone, Rogow gets emails from his friends asking how he could represent the former Nixon aide.
Rogow, who evokes images of Abe Lincoln with his signature bow tie and chinstrap beard, is a staunch adherent to the First Amendment, which is how he came to represent Nazis and rappers. And from the perspective of the law, he says, there's little difference between Stone and Trump, or for that matter, David Duke and Uncle Luke.
“ All of these [reactions] underscore intolerance, which is the greatest threat we have to a civil society,” he said. “Tolerance of others' ideas, tolerance of others' work; tolerance of others' beliefs is critical.”
Rogow insists he will continue to represent clients as long as they keep coming, and he hopes that his practice, one that often had him representing the homeless and wealthy simultaneously, will be instructive to future generations as they wrestle with issues around speech and discourse.
“Perhaps my past and present representation of unpopular people and causes can remind people that suppressing speech is more dangerous than listening to it.”
Related Reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law Media Law Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump and Carr’s FCC
- 2Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 3Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 4Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 5People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250