Kirkland Lawyers in Spotlight Amid New Epstein Criminal Case
Jeffrey Epstein previously escaped federal charges when his Kirkland lawyer had a tete-a-tete with a U.S. attorney who used to work at the firm.
July 09, 2019 at 01:33 PM
7 minute read
Kirkland & Ellis is not representing accused sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein this time around, but the law firm and its alumni's prints are all over his current criminal case in New York federal court.
Epstein's criminal case history includes several Kirkland litigators, past and present, including longtime partner Jay Lefkowitz and former Kirkland litigators Alexander Acosta, now U.S. labor secretary, and Kenneth Starr.
With Epstein's arrest July 6 for sex trafficking, and a government investigation into a plea deal reached by Epstein's attorneys in 2007, actions by those Kirkland litigators will likely receive fresh scrutiny.
In particular, legal ethics experts told ALM that a 2007 meeting between Lefkowitz, one of Epstein's defense attorneys at the time, and Acosta, then the top federal prosecutor in Miami, would likely be of interest to the Justice Department, which announced in February it was investigating how Epstein's prior criminal case was resolved.
“The fact of the remote meeting with a former colleague of Acosta's will certainly be an issue in DOJ's review of how the plea deal was reached,” said Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics professor at New York University School of Law, adding, “put simply, it is suspicious.”
New sex trafficking charges against Epstein were revealed Monday in Manhattan. Prosecutors said they were not bound by the earlier plea agreement negotiated by Acosta. Reid Weingarten, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson LLP, as well as Martin Weinberg and Marc Allan Fernich, who run their own firms, represent Epstein in the New York case.
In a statement Monday, Kirkland said it no longer represents Epstein. “Kirkland & Ellis has not represented Jeffrey Epstein in eight years and has no involvement in his current case,” said a Kirkland spokesperson, declining to comment further.
|A Private Meeting
Kirkland's previous representation of Epstein, in a sex crimes case, is distinct from its usual clientele of large corporations and private equity firms in government enforcement litigation.
At the time Kirkland and others were representing Epstein in 2007, he was facing a draft 53-page federal indictment with allegations that he had built a network of underage girls to coerce into having sex acts, according to the Miami Herald's reporting.
In October that year, Acosta, the Miami U.S. attorney who was previously a litigator at Kirkland, met with Lefkowitz, a longtime a partner at the firm, to negotiate issues related to a nonprosecution agreement, according to the Herald. Instead of meeting at the prosecutor's Miami headquarters, the two former colleagues met at the Marriott in West Palm Beach, about 70 miles away, when a deal was struck, the Herald reported.
The agreement required Epstein, a wealthy money manager, to plead guilty to state prostitution charges that ultimately only resulted in 13 months behind bars. Even then, Epstein was free for up to 16 hours a day for much of his sentence.
In a letter sent by Lefkowitz memorializing the meeting, the Herald reported, he thanked Acosta for working out a deal that included a commitment by the U.S. attorney not to contact “any of the identified individuals, potential witnesses or potential civil claimants” against Epstein.
Several legal ethics experts told ALM that Acosta meeting with a former colleague at Kirkland to hammer out the resolution of a case wasn't itself an ethical concern—but the circumstances and the location of the setting were troubling.
Defense lawyers regularly negotiate with prosecutors who are former colleagues, said John B. Harris, a partner at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz who focuses on legal ethics, professional liability and white-collar defense matters.
But, he said: “That a prosecutor and a defense lawyer would meet privately at a hotel over breakfast to negotiate a deal for the defense lawyer's client is unusual and smacks of preferential treatment. Most defense attorneys meet with prosecutors, including the prosecutors actually handling the case, at the prosecutor's offices during regular business hours.”
Similarly, Gillers said, holding a meeting at a “remote location will inevitably suggest special treatment in the public's mind and the appearance that Acosta was trying to hide his conduct.”
These events, ethics expert said, will likely weigh into the Justice Department's investigation of how the Florida case was handled, meaning more questions could be asked of Kirkland.
The Justice Department has said that its Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) would investigate “allegations that department attorneys may have committed professional misconduct in the manner in which the Epstein criminal matter was resolved.” According to DOJ guidance, OPR's investigation process, in general, includes obtaining relevant documents and conducting witness interviews, but OPR does not have authority to issue witness or document subpoenas to nondepartment personnel.
“An investigator,” Harris said, “might well be interested in examples of favorable treatment received by well-connected defense lawyers, especially given the hands-on involvement of the U.S. attorney himself.” And, Harris said, it makes sense “that an investigator would want to know what private conversations the U.S. attorney and a defense lawyer had about the deal and what possible influences or inducements could have affected the resolution.”
|A Bevy of Lawyers
Lefkowitz represented Epstein along with other titans of the defense bar, such as Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Alan Dershowitz and his Kirkland colleague Kenneth Starr, who had previously helped recruit Acosta to Kirkland in the 1990s. Starr was a partner at Kirkland from 1993 until 2004 and remained counsel to the firm until at least 2010.
Lefkowitz, who joined Kirkland in 1993, continued to represent Epstein as recently as 2011 in a New York state court proceeding regarding his sex-offender status, court records show.
Acosta, who worked at Kirkland from 1995 to 1997, has repeatedly faced criticism for his role in the nonprosecution agreement. The deal was not revealed to Epstein's alleged victims, which a federal judge has deemed a violation of the Crime Victims Rights Act.
Acosta has defended his office's work, saying it ensured Epstein received time behind bars.
In a 2011 letter published by The Daily Beast, he said Epstein's “army of legal superstars” went so far as to investigate the personal lives of prosecutors in search of material that could be used to disqualify them.
In the letter, Acosta said he had known Dershowitz, Starr and Lefkowitz “from my time in law school and at Kirkland & Ellis in the mid-90s. They all sought to make peace. I agreed to talk and meet with all of them after Epstein pled guilty, as I think it is important that prosecutors battle defense attorneys in a case and then move on. I have tried, yet I confess that has been difficult to do fully in this case.”
Meanwhile, another Kirkland alum may be jumping into the newest Epstein case.
Attorney General William Barr is recused from any review of the earlier plea deal that allowed Epstein to avoid federal charges in Florida. But Barr, who practiced at Kirkland in 2009 and then again in 2017 until 2019, has consulted with Justice Department ethics officials and will not recuse himself from overseeing Epstein's new criminal case, The Associated Press and others reported.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250