Two Law Firm Subsidiaries Stand Out as Clients Embrace Alternatives
Alternative legal service providers owned by Eversheds Sutherland and Fenwick & West were among the leading examples cited in a new survey by the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium, or CLOC.
July 19, 2019 at 02:51 PM
3 minute read
As an increasing number of law firms are trotting out their own alternative legal service providers, two have already caught on with corporate legal departments.
A new report from the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium, or CLOC, revealed that nearly half of the 213 respondents had used ALSPs in 2018. The 17 outfits they named as favorites included subsidiaries of Eversheds Sutherland and Fenwick & West.
Eversheds Consulting and FLEX by Fenwick joined names like Axiom, Elevate and Integreon, as well as Big Four firms Deloitte, EY and PwC, as 34% of respondents reported making increasing use of ALSPs in the last year.
Both Eversheds Consulting and FLEX are longstanding players in the ALSP arena, even if the former technically ceased to exist last month. Eversheds Sutherland announced in June that it would be merging its advisory unit, officially titled ES Consulting, with its corporate secretarial and volume insolvency teams into one unit, named Konexo. The firm said that while the current units, combined, bring in £40 million, or about $50.77 million, of annual revenue, it sought to boost that number to nearly $127 million.
Fenwick's FLEX dates back to 2010, and matches companies with temporary in-house attorneys, promising them the ability to work for a diverse portfolio of tech companies.
Other firms are still extending their own flexible lawyer services; in one example, Pinsent Masons brought its staffing subsidiary Vario to Hong Kong in April.
But the trend is shifting toward subsidiaries that offer corporate law departments and other customers technological solutions. Take Greenberg Traurig, which in June unveiled Recurve, a platform aimed at connecting law firms and in-house attorneys with providers of legal tech services, nimble staffing and real estate experts, artificial intelligence purveyors, and more.
Other similar examples include Dentons' legal technology startup NextLaw Labs, unveiled in 2015, and Reed Smith's GravityStack, launched last year.
These law firms' commitment to finding alternate ways to offer services to clients matches up with another finding from the CLOC report, addressing what innovations law departments are seeking from their firms.
The top four results, in order, were more creative and alternative fee arrangements, better project management, more internal use of technology, and client-facing digital services with self-service access to advice and solutions.
At least for some firms, it seems, the message is getting across.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher Launches in Luxembourg With Hires From A&O Shearman, Clifford Chance
3 minute readA&O Shearman's Former U.S. Co-Chair to Leave Partnership
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250