Burford Reports Record First Half, Blames Profit-Taking for Declining Shares
With the litigation funder's income climbing 40% and profits up 36%, CEO Chris Bogart said the legal industry, "long a cash-only business," is embracing capital in earnest.
July 25, 2019 at 03:21 PM
3 minute read
Third-party litigation funder Burford Capital Ltd. reported record financial results for the first half of 2019 on Thursday, with income climbing 40% to $287 million and profits rising 36% to $225 million after taxes.
The company grew at a faster rate than the first half of 2018, during which Burford’s income rose 17%, to $205.2 million.
Nonetheless, the publicly traded litigation financier’s shares dropped nearly 6% on the London Stock Exchange following the release of the numbers.
Burford chief executive officer Chris Bogart said the company’s performance actually exceeded analysts’ expectations, and attributed the drop to long-term investors taking the opportunity to cash out.
“Where we are—in a last-stage frothy market, with jittery investors—if you invested at the IPO 10 years ago, you’ve made 17 times your money,” he said. “There’s profit-taking that goes on after that.”
Bogart highlighted the growing demand for Burford’s capital, which was reflected in record new investment commitments of $751 million, up 36% from the first half of 2018.
“The legal industry, long a cash-only business, is starting to become a user of capital,” he told investors.
The numbers suggest that Burford is outpacing its rivals when it comes to investments. Bentham IMF, the second largest publicly traded litigation outfit, committed AUD $147 million, or $102.6 million, in its 2018 fiscal year, a figure Burford outpaced by over 7% in just the last six months.
Nonetheless, the company has been able to maintain high expectations for returns, even amid surging competition in the marketplace and its internal growth.
“We are not going to reduce return demands in response to competition,” Burford chief investment officer Jonathan Molot told investors. “There’s not a downward trajectory on returns associated with growth.”
The company reported demand for its core litigation finance capital, specifically, single claims and portfolios of matters, was up 48%.
Seventeen percent of the total $751 million invested came in one portfolio deal totaling $130 million. According to Burford, the arrangement took a year to structure and the company faced no competition from peers.
While the company opened a Singapore office in 2017, in conjunction with that jurisdiction’s legalization of third-party finance for arbitration, the country and other Asian markets have been slow to have an uptick in terms of direct utilization of capital, Molot told investors. But the increased presence on the region has instead fueled in-bound work.
“More Asian clients are using our capital in other jurisdictions, predominantly the U.S., than in Asia itself,” he said.
|Read More
Burford Sells $100M Stake in Argentine Oil Case After SCOTUS Nixes Appeal
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Former Perkins Coie Partner Moves to Stradley Ronon in Chicago
Status Driven With Unpredictable Fees: What Private Equity Clients Really Think About Their Lawyers
7 minute readRising Varied Investment Products, Regulatory Activity Drive Demand in Investment Funds
Trending Stories
- 1Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 2Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 3Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 4Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 5Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250