David Boies Is Not Finished With Jeffrey Epstein
The high-profile lawyer rejects the idea that representing Jeffrey Epstein's victims is a "redemption tour" after receiving criticism for his role in the Harvey Weinstein scandal.
July 26, 2019 at 03:43 PM
5 minute read
|
If David Boies is giving it away, why wouldn't you take it?
I'm talking about his pro bono representation of sex trafficking victims in the Jeffrey Epstein matter. Boies and his firm Boies Schiller Flexner are emerging as the go-to lawyers for women allegedly victimized by the billionaire pedophile. Currently, the firm is representing at least eight of the female victims. And that number is expected to swell.
“With the publicity about Epstein, more women have been calling us,” Boies told me during a recent phone chat. “Some are looking for guidance, and some are still very wary of Epstein's power, and, frankly, wary of the government.”
Boies cast as the knight in shining armor is a familiar trope. But before we get into his role in the Epstein fiasco, let's first deal with that elephant in the room, meaning this: Is Boies representing victims of sex trafficking to salvage his brand?
Sure, that's a cynical question, but that's what people ask me when I mention Boies' involvement.
It's been a rough two years for the star litigator. He suffered a terrible personal loss earlier this year. On the professional front, Boies lost a chunk of his halo when his role in the Harvey Weinstein scandal came to light in the fall of 2017. During his representation of the movie mogul, Boies personally signed the contract to retain Black Cube, an investigative agency hired to thwart the publication of an article in the New York Times about Weinstein's abuse of women. (He claimed that he did it unthinkingly at the client's behest.) Overnight, it seemed, Boies got caught in the #MeToo net, getting labeled as another highly paid enabler of a powerful ogre.
So back to that pesky question: Is Boies going to battle for Epstein's victims a redemption tour?
Boies sounded slightly pained when I posed that question. “We started this long before Weinstein was controversial,” he answered. “When we started representing Weinstein, he was a highly respected producer.”
In fact, his firm started representing Epstein's victim Virginia Roberts (Jane Doe #3) in 2014, practically eons before Weinstein became the poster boy for male toxicity. The firm sued Ghislaine Maxwell, an Epstein cohort, on Roberts' behalf for defamation. In 2017, it took on Sarah Ransome as a client, suing Epstein for sex trafficking. Both cases have settled. And now there's a pending suit by Roberts against Alan Dershowitz for defamation. (Look out for my post on that soon.)
Boies also stressed that the Epstein matter represents a continuation of his firm's pro bono priorities: “Sex trafficking and the abuse of women have been major pro bono efforts of our firm, so this was something that fit.” He pointed out that his firm has a history of representing sex trafficking victims, citing its role in suing Backpage.com, a site that enabled child prostitution. (Law.com's Jenna Greene reported last year that the firm, working with Legal Momentum, succeeded in shutting down the site, after a two-year fight.)
He added: “Anyone who says that I'm doing this for some kind of redemption has another agenda.”
OK, I posed the elephant question, so I moved on. Why, I asked, of the myriad pro bono requests he and his firm must get, is representing Epstein's victims so compelling?
Boies said it galled him how Epstein was able to flout justice. “It was absolutely astonishing that he had a sex trafficking ring and could walk the street. It represented a serious breakdown of our legal system.”
Moreover, “sex trafficking doesn't get the attention it deserves,” said Boies. “It doesn't touch most homes as other #MeToo activities do. Politicians and the media find it harder to identify with victims of sex trafficking who come from the most vulnerable parts of our society: primarily girls without resources, who aren't highly educated and are suspicious of authority.”
I was also curious if Boies is personally involved in this high-profile matter and how much time, money and resources all this representation is sucking up.
“This has been a major project for me in the last five years,” said Boies, who also credited his partner Sigrid McCawley's deep involvement. He said the firm had to assemble “a good size team” (including Meredith Schultz, Josh Schiller, Ben Margulis, Andrew Villacastin, Andrew Marrero and Sandra Perkins) because “Epstein has a huge team and is paying the legal fees of other defendants.” (In a separate conversation, McCawley confirmed that the case against Epstein's cohort Maxwell was extremely hard-fought. “The other side was well-funded. We argued over 50 motions. I was in court every week,” she said.)
And what's this costing Boies Schiller? “The firm has spent millions of dollars worth of legal fees and hundreds of thousands of dollars in expenses” over the last five years, he said.
As for the next stage of the Epstein matter, Boies is leaving us with a cliffhanger: “When the Second Circuit unseals the records in the Maxwell case [the defamation suit brought by Roberts], people will get a sense of the magnitude.” He added, “Epstein will be in jail for a very long time. And his confederates will be charged. This is only the beginning.”
Well, that sounds ominous.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Big Law Walks a Tightrope, Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readHoly Grail: Can Changing Big Law Recruiting, Hiring and Training Lead to Greater Retention?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250