Do Associate Perks Make a Difference in the Law Firm Talent War?
After years of salary brinkmanship, many firms are looking for more effective ways to attract top-flight talent.
July 29, 2019 at 10:55 AM
5 minute read
Money isn't everything.
That, at least, is what several firms in Big Law want to believe as they continue to roll out perks and initiatives to lure and retain associates.
Last week, Reed Smith—a firm that has chosen not to match the top dollar many law firms pay their associates—unveiled a new slate of perks for its attorneys, including changes to the firm's billable hour policy, a continuing education track and an internal recognition program.
“Reed Smith should be applauded, and I wish more firms would think of creative ways to hire people instead of being on an auction block,” said Joe Ankus, a 30-year legal recruiter and founder of Ankus Consulting.
The firm rejected the $190,000 associate benchmark set by Milbank last year, citing the “interest of its clients,” and first-year salaries hover between $150,000 and $180,000 according to ALM's Legal Compass. That trend could be growing: A 2019 report by the National Association for Law Placement found that fewer firms have followed Milbank's lead.
Greenberg Traurig also refused to engage in the salary war and instead has focused on offering associates what it considers a more rounded experience. The firm offers alternative attorney tracks, online career development platforms and law firm economic training sessions conducted by co-president Brad Kaufman, among other programs.
“Compensation is only one part of the total associate package,” he said. “We are committed to helping our associates enhance their core competencies, deliver positive and urgent client service and build their business development skills, while also creating a collaborative environment and recognizing the need for maintaining a work-life balance.”
To be sure, it's not easy to quantify the value of these attract-and-retain initiatives or measure how effective they are in luring and keeping associates who might be considering higher-paying offers. But Scott Westfahl, who consults with numerous Am Law 100 firms as director of executive education at Harvard Law School, calls the salary wars “a race to the bottom,” noting that big salaries aren't enough to differentiate a firm from its competitors.
“The value proposition for talent at a law firm, if it isn't differentiated on other metrics, boils down to salaries,” Westfahl said. “Then everybody is losing profitability instead of creating a differentiated model.”
Estimates indicate the cost of the last associate salary hike may run as high as seven figures for a large firm like Milbank, and corporate clients have made it clear they aren't happy about the yearly raises, as the cost is often passed along to them in the form of higher billing rates. Attrition is also still a major issue across the career spectrum: 47% of laterals leave within five years.
While many firms now offer business development training and flexible work schedules for attorneys going on leave, Westfahl said it's paramount that these perks are front and center in the firm's recruitment process.
“One you have to differentiate, two you have to market,” he said. “The hottest topic in the corporate talent world is brand differentiation.”
Even firms that did raise salaries have developed policies similar to Reed Smith's.
Milbank, for example, has its own education program—Milbank@Harvard—which is administered with the help of Westfahl. All fourth-, fifth- and sixth-year associates take business classes at Harvard University each year to learn about finance, business development and marketing. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett has a similar arrangement with Columbia Business School.
“It definitely helps our lateral recruiting,” said Milbank partner and executive director David Wolfson. “Our ability to train people within Milbank is one of the most important when you join us. We can give you lots of money, but it doesn't have the same value over the course of your life.”
Other training programs at Milbank are specific to practice areas. Deals@Milbank teaches transactional skills such as drafting and negotiating; Advocacy@Milbank trains litigators in such skills such as presentation and writing. The firm also has moved into a new 250,000-square-foot office in Manhattan's new and trendy Hudson Yards in an effort to modernize its image.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld also has special associate initiatives, such as a short-term travel program that allows lawyers at the third-year level and above to spend time in other offices. And, like at Reed Smith, many of its special programs originated from associate committee meetings or hackathons—a very important asset in the recruiting market, said Lauren Marsh, Akin Gump's director of attorney recruiting.
“These changes were important to our chairperson Kim Koopersmith and senior leaders,” Marsh said. “Being able to tell potential hires that many of these policies came out of suggestions from associates reflects that the firm is willing to hear them out and ensure they're satisfied.”
Similar Stories:
Reed Smith Adds On Even More Perks for Associates
Reed Smith, Citing 'Interests of Clients,' Won't Increase Associate Salaries
'The Tone Deafness Is Astounding': Clients Unhappy About Milbank Associate Raise Announcement
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThree Akin Sports Lawyers Jump to Employment Firm Littler Mendelson
Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250