Do Associate Perks Make a Difference in the Law Firm Talent War?
After years of salary brinkmanship, many firms are looking for more effective ways to attract top-flight talent.
July 29, 2019 at 10:55 AM
5 minute read
Money isn't everything.
That, at least, is what several firms in Big Law want to believe as they continue to roll out perks and initiatives to lure and retain associates.
Last week, Reed Smith—a firm that has chosen not to match the top dollar many law firms pay their associates—unveiled a new slate of perks for its attorneys, including changes to the firm's billable hour policy, a continuing education track and an internal recognition program.
“Reed Smith should be applauded, and I wish more firms would think of creative ways to hire people instead of being on an auction block,” said Joe Ankus, a 30-year legal recruiter and founder of Ankus Consulting.
The firm rejected the $190,000 associate benchmark set by Milbank last year, citing the “interest of its clients,” and first-year salaries hover between $150,000 and $180,000 according to ALM's Legal Compass. That trend could be growing: A 2019 report by the National Association for Law Placement found that fewer firms have followed Milbank's lead.
Greenberg Traurig also refused to engage in the salary war and instead has focused on offering associates what it considers a more rounded experience. The firm offers alternative attorney tracks, online career development platforms and law firm economic training sessions conducted by co-president Brad Kaufman, among other programs.
“Compensation is only one part of the total associate package,” he said. “We are committed to helping our associates enhance their core competencies, deliver positive and urgent client service and build their business development skills, while also creating a collaborative environment and recognizing the need for maintaining a work-life balance.”
To be sure, it's not easy to quantify the value of these attract-and-retain initiatives or measure how effective they are in luring and keeping associates who might be considering higher-paying offers. But Scott Westfahl, who consults with numerous Am Law 100 firms as director of executive education at Harvard Law School, calls the salary wars “a race to the bottom,” noting that big salaries aren't enough to differentiate a firm from its competitors.
“The value proposition for talent at a law firm, if it isn't differentiated on other metrics, boils down to salaries,” Westfahl said. “Then everybody is losing profitability instead of creating a differentiated model.”
Estimates indicate the cost of the last associate salary hike may run as high as seven figures for a large firm like Milbank, and corporate clients have made it clear they aren't happy about the yearly raises, as the cost is often passed along to them in the form of higher billing rates. Attrition is also still a major issue across the career spectrum: 47% of laterals leave within five years.
While many firms now offer business development training and flexible work schedules for attorneys going on leave, Westfahl said it's paramount that these perks are front and center in the firm's recruitment process.
“One you have to differentiate, two you have to market,” he said. “The hottest topic in the corporate talent world is brand differentiation.”
Even firms that did raise salaries have developed policies similar to Reed Smith's.
Milbank, for example, has its own education program—Milbank@Harvard—which is administered with the help of Westfahl. All fourth-, fifth- and sixth-year associates take business classes at Harvard University each year to learn about finance, business development and marketing. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett has a similar arrangement with Columbia Business School.
“It definitely helps our lateral recruiting,” said Milbank partner and executive director David Wolfson. “Our ability to train people within Milbank is one of the most important when you join us. We can give you lots of money, but it doesn't have the same value over the course of your life.”
Other training programs at Milbank are specific to practice areas. Deals@Milbank teaches transactional skills such as drafting and negotiating; Advocacy@Milbank trains litigators in such skills such as presentation and writing. The firm also has moved into a new 250,000-square-foot office in Manhattan's new and trendy Hudson Yards in an effort to modernize its image.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld also has special associate initiatives, such as a short-term travel program that allows lawyers at the third-year level and above to spend time in other offices. And, like at Reed Smith, many of its special programs originated from associate committee meetings or hackathons—a very important asset in the recruiting market, said Lauren Marsh, Akin Gump's director of attorney recruiting.
“These changes were important to our chairperson Kim Koopersmith and senior leaders,” Marsh said. “Being able to tell potential hires that many of these policies came out of suggestions from associates reflects that the firm is willing to hear them out and ensure they're satisfied.”
|Similar Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Big Law Walks a Tightrope, Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Why the Founders of IP Boutique Fisch Sigler Are Stepping Away From the Law and Starting an AI Venture
- 2Trump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
- 3Lisa Zornberg, Former Adams Chief Counsel, Moves to Morvillo Abramowitz
- 4Elite Boutiques Competing More With Big Law Bonuses, With Several Going Above Market
- 5Tuesday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250