Lawyer Who Claimed She Was a 'Diversity Prop' Settles With Former Firm
A North Carolina firm tapped Morgan Lewis partner Grace Speights to push back after it was called "a contemporary version of an old-fashioned Southern plantation.”
July 30, 2019 at 03:56 PM
4 minute read
A North Carolina lawyer agreed this week to drop a lawsuit claiming her former firm fraudulently touted its diversity when it employed only a few attorneys of color and then retaliated against her when she complained.
Sharika Robinson, a former litigation associate at Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinkson, reached settlement with her former firm as of Monday, according to a docket entry in U.S. district court in Charlotte, North Carolina. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed.
As the case generated headlines earlier this year, Robinson Bradshaw tapped the leader of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius' labor and employment group Grace Speights to defend the firm. Speights was named The American Lawyer's 2018 Attorney of the Year for her labor and employment work that made her an ally of the #MeToo movement.
“We are pleased the case settled amicably, and we are confident Sharika Robinson will be very successful as she moves forward opening her own law practice in Charlotte,” wrote Carmen Caruso, who represented Robinson, in an emailed statement. “We're hoping to work with her as a colleague as opportunities arise. She is a very talented young lawyer with a bright future.”
Robinson sued the firm in March, alleging it marketed itself as committed to diversity even though it is dominated by white men. She claimed the firm used its few minority and women attorneys as “diversity props”—using her name and image in marketing materials but internally discriminating against her and frequently giving her ”grunt work” despite her qualifications.
“In truth, Robinson Bradshaw secretly remains [a] 'good ol' boys club' dominated by white male partners,” her complaint said. “The firm uses minorities and women lawyers as 'diversity props' to impress clients while overtly, systematically, implicitly, and intentionally discriminating against and oppressing them.”
According to Robinson's complaint, in one instance she was invited by a black male partner, Robert Harrington, to a firm-sponsored holiday party in 2016, only to realize the party was for black employees alone and conversations about race were barred. The suit refers to the party as “segregated” and “an early signal she had unknowingly been recruited to a contemporary version of an old-fashioned Southern plantation.”
Four male partners were named as defendants, along with Robinson Bradshaw: Harrington, who co-leads the firm's litigation practice and is the only black partner named as a defendant; managing partner Allen Robertson; and litigators Jonathan Krisko and Gregory Skidmore, a former Kirkland & Ellis partner.
At the time of the complaint, Robinson Bradshaw denied the claims and released a statement reaffirming the firm's commitment to diversity.
“Robinson Bradshaw denies Sharika Robinson's claims, and specifically denies that the firm discriminated against her in any way,” the firm's general counsel Kate Maynard wrote in a March 6 statement. “We are committed to diversity and inclusion, as evidenced by our attorneys' contributions to the firm, profession and community as a whole.”
Via email, Maynard confirmed Tuesday that the complaint was resolved amicably and will be dismissed.
In a motion to dismiss filed by Morgan Lewis' Speights and other defense lawyers in May, the defendants asserted that Robinson simply disagreed with the firm's decisions and feedback about her performance. “Yet, instead of alleging facts that would suggest actual wrongdoing, plaintiff converts her disagreements into a public attack on her employer's diversity efforts,” the firm wrote.
“She contends that by extolling these efforts, the firm defrauded her into believing that she would be free from stress, free from criticisms that she did not agree with, free from work assignments that she did not want, and, in essence, free from the struggles that law firm associates routinely face,” the motion asserts. “Not only were no such promises ever made, but this also is not what diversity efforts are intended to do.”
The racial discrimination complaint comes at a time when many law firms are highlighting their commitment to diversity and inclusion and introducing initiatives to hire, support and retain women attorneys and attorneys of color. But concerns remain that these efforts are geared mainly toward mollifying clients, rather than promoting diversity and equality within the profession.
Despite heightened efforts over the last decade, the number of diverse attorneys in Big Law remains low, and management remains dominated by white men: According to the National Association for Law Placement, minority partner representation in Big Law has risen only from 6% in 2009 to 9.1% in 2018.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250