'We're Sort of a Wolf Pack': All-Women Litigation Team Doesn't Sacrifice Career or Family
The Nelson Mullins team believes it can serve as a model for law firms looking to improve their women attorney recruitment and retention rates.
July 31, 2019 at 01:02 PM
4 minute read
Four attorneys who make up an all-women litigation team at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough believe they have created an ideal career template for female attorneys who do not want to be forced to choose between career and parental success.
Commercial litigators Erin Kolmansberger, Kimberly Freedman, Melissa Gomberg and Daniela Ferro have worked together in Miami for several years, having formed their team when they were part of legacy Broad & Cassel, which merged with Nelson Mullins last year. Three of them are now mothers of young children.
The four lawyers—three of counsel and one associate—generally handle one large case and several smaller cases at one time. The bigger cases, they say, range from $10 million to a few billion dollars in damages. They say their team approach is successful because they play off each other’s strengths and weaknesses. They describe Gomberg as the laser, able to quickly track relevant case law and research; Kolmansberger is the project manager; Ferro is the team “mom” and a quick learner; and Freedman is the appellate star.
“We’re sort of a wolf pack,” Gomberg says.
While law firms have increasingly rolled out mother-friendly programs and generous parental leave policies in recent years, retention rates for women in Big Law are still dismal. Morrison & Foerster and Jones Day have both been hit by gender discrimination lawsuits this year.
Kolmansberger believes legal teams like hers should be a model for law firms looking to improve their women attorney recruitment and retention rates. She isn’t advocating solely for all-women teams, but a meaningfully diverse team like hers fosters a collaborative environment that benefits the attorneys, firms and clients, she says.
“This is a model that has worked for us. Our hope is that we can replicate it in other offices,” Kolmansberger said. “We want … future generations to have it easier.”
Nelson Mullins Miami managing partner Mark Raymond, who hired the four lawyers and staffed the team as it evolved over the last three years, agrees. He says they offer a case study of how teamwork breeds success.
And the all-women team gives Nelson Mullins, which ranked 69th in the Am Law 100 this year, another advantage: At a time when companies are evaluating outside counsel based in part on a firm’s demonstrated commitment to diversity, being able to present an all-women litigation team to potential clients is a bonus—and an opportunity the firm does not pass up.
Raymond says he hopes to see their model replicated through the firm.
The group has developed a tight working relationship. They share professional stories in a group chat, cover each other during emergencies and provide emotional support in moments of doubt and weakness.
More than anything, Kolmansberger said, the tight-knit support is the most essential part of their success. When her son’s eardrum burst, for example, Gomberg stepped in so that Kolmansberger could take him to the hospital. When Freedman was out on maternity leave, they all came over to her house to not only see the baby but also to update her on what was going on in their cases.
“At no point have I ever felt my job is at risk,” Kolmansberger said. “I know they have my back.”
The kind of flexibility this group affords each other can have implications that extend beyond working mothers, according to Karen Kaplowitz, an adviser to Working Mother’s Best Law Firms for Women Initiative.
“The No. 1 best practice for working mothers is flexibility,” Kaplowitz said. “As law firms create more flexibility for parents, they’ll also be healthier and have more livable work cultures.”
Kolmansberger and Gomberg are slated to talk about their experience and success at The Miami Women, Diversity & Change Summit in November.
“None of the stuff they do is mandated by management,” Raymond said. “They do it because they know it’s the best path for them regarding their mental health, parenting and career.”
Related Reading:
Take a Long Parental Leave and Make Partner? Dream On, Baby
In ‘Mommy Track’ Lawsuit, MoFo Points to Its Track Record for Defense
Jones Day Bias Claims Spread to Atlanta, New York as More Accusers Go Public
170 GCs Pen Open Letter to Law Firms: Improve on Diversity or Lose Our Business
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG Wants to Provide Legal Services in the US. Now All Eyes Are on Their Big Four Peers
K&L Gates Sheds Space, but Will Stay in Flagship Pittsburgh Office After Lease Renewal
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250