Women Who Left the Profession Are Getting Back in the Saddle
Diversity Lab's OnRamp Fellowship, a reentry program, just celebrated its fifth anniversary—and it's logging some noteworthy results.
July 31, 2019 at 02:51 PM
4 minute read
Let me say up front that I was skeptical. I'm talking about those programs aimed at helping women reenter the legal profession after a long hiatus. You know the spiel: Women often drop out to raise a family, and the profession should give them a chance to get back in the saddle.
Nothing wrong with that, but I wasn't totally sold. First, I wondered what masochist would want back into law, particularly at a law firm. Second, I questioned whether this was the best use of our resources to promote women, given the immense effort it would take.
Apparently, there are lots of masochists out there—and they're on a roll. Diversity Lab's OnRamp Fellowship just celebrated its fifth anniversary, and it's logging noteworthy results.
Consider these milestones: the program has 81 fellows (current and alums) to date; 86% of fellows who completed the program have received job offers in law firms or corporations; and 32 firms and eight companies have signed on to take fellows, and the list is growing (in 2014, only four firms participated: Baker Botts, Cooley, Hogan Lovells and Sidley Austin).
Granted, these are not huge numbers. Putting a few dozen women back into law is a drop in the ocean of female lawyers who've left the profession. Yet, you have to applaud OnRamp for steadily building the program and creating an impressive track record.
One big reason for OnRamp's success is it's an extremely comprehensive program. Candidates go through an exhaustive process, including behavioral interviews and assessments of skills (legal writing and oral presentation) and academic background (dust off that transcript). Then, if the candidate is lucky enough to be picked by a firm or company for the yearlong fellowship—only 20% of applicants are selected—more rounds of training and mentoring follow.
Unlike other programs for returnees that are six- to eight-week internships, this one lasts a whole year. "You can't do a deal or work on a case for a few weeks and do meaningful work," says Caren Ulrich Stacy, OnRamp's indefatigable founder.
The program's duration gives fellows a dose of reality about returning to law. Endless vetting, constant coaching and a yearlong commitment—curious dabblers need not apply. But there's also handholding, and that's what sustains the women.
"Confidence is a huge thing," Stacy says. "There are points along the road where they need reassurance that they belong."
By the end of a fellowship, Stacy says, the women have achieved that. The proof of this confidence? Once they get an offer from their firm or company, they're able to negotiate for a higher salary. "They all get pay raises and the majority are paid much higher, in the middle to senior rung," Stacy says. (Fellows get an annual stipend between $110,000 and $160,000.)
To the women who've been given another shot at rejoining Big Law or the legal group of a major company, the answer is a resounding yes. Kathy Herman, who left practice to care for her ailing parents, says most firms and companies wouldn't give her a look despite her 20-plus years of experience. Herman, a former fellow at Blank Rome who's now an associate at the firm, says, "OnRamp enabled me to tell my story in a way that legitimized my choice to step away from practice."
What's undeniable is that everyone associated with OnRamp—participants, employers, coaches and mentors—is out to prove that these women aren't done, and that they can still kill it. How can anyone not cheer them on?
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected] or @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250