Marijuana buds on California marijuana packaging. Photo: InFootage/ShutterstockQuinn Emanuel Bets on Pot Disputes With Cannabis Litigation Practice
There's nothing mellow about the country's biggest litigation firm getting into the cannabis business.
August 05, 2019 at 03:10 PM
3 minute read
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan jumped headfirst into the marijuana economy on Monday, becoming the biggest law firm yet to boast a dedicated cannabis practice, and the first major firm to launch one devoted exclusively to litigation.
The 830-lawyer, litigation-only firm said its cannabis litigation practice group will be headed by Los Angles partner Robert Becher and will include over a dozen partners in six different offices. The firm's website currently lists 15 partners in the practice, including Boston office leader Harvey Wolkoff, intellectual property practice co-chairman Claude Stern in Silicon Valley, white-collar and investigations practice co-chairman Alex Spiro in New York and insurance recovery practice chairwoman Danielle Gilmore in Los Angeles.
Aside from advertising the firm's eagerness to take part in the multibillion-dollar sector, can the new practice offer cannabis clients a real competitive advantage in the courtroom?
Becher believes so.
"There are a lot of nuances to state and local cannabis law," he said. "It's critical that a firm be familiar with those issues."
Becher said Quinn Emanuel has already been handling commercial litigation matters related to cannabis, but that recently there had been an uptick in business that helped prompt the firm to publicly market its capabilities.
|
➤➤ For more on law firm cannabis practices, check out Higher Law, a weekly newsletter on marijuana issues from Law.com. Learn more.
The firm said in a press release that its current cannabis clients, which it did not identify by name, include retailers, private equity firms, CEOs, corporate board members and a pharmaceutical company. Court records show that the firm has represented at least one cannabis retailer in a business dispute. MedMen, a cannabis retailer with a presence in 12 states operating 37 retail locations, was able to secure a dismissal of a mismanagement suit brought against it by early investors.
Becher said he expects the practice to grow, if for no other reason than that the amount of money flowing through the cannabis industry is growing annually.
"The clients in the cannabis industry are becoming more valuable," Becher said. "That tends to result in more litigation."
In its press release touting the practice, the firm cited the forecasted growth of the sector—over $10 billion in revenue last year, with $16 billion in investment expected this year in North America—and the increased number of U.S. states that allow for recreational use.
"We are the world's top litigation firm, and we have always been at the forefront of disputes involving emerging and innovative industries," Quinn Emanuel founder John Quinn said in a statement. "It is only natural for the firm to establish itself as the preeminent expert in this field."
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute read
Legal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute read
As Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
