Are Parental Leave Policies Innovative or Just Expected Now?
Sidley joins other firms, including Reed Smith and K&L Gates, in rolling out a more generous leave policy for its attorneys. Have parental leave policies become an industry standard?
August 07, 2019 at 03:10 PM
3 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock
Sidley Austin is the latest firm to roll out or enhance a parental leave program, extending time off from 10 weeks to 14 weeks, removing primary and secondary caregiver distinctions and allowing birth mothers to use eight weeks of medical leave to extend their time away to 22 total weeks.
Larry Barden, chair of Sidley’s management committee, said the new policy is intended to attract “the next generation of lawyers.”
“The changes to our parental leave policy reflect the firm’s ongoing commitment to support our lawyers and attract the best talent,” Barden said in an email.
But Sidley is far from the only firm to enhance its leave policy in recent months. Both Reed Smith and K&L Gates, for example, have announced robust improvements to their leave programs in the past few weeks.
The question many are asking now is: Who doesn’t have a leave policy? And what role do these schemes play as firms increasingly turn to generous perks to lure the best talent?
A large chunk, if not the majority, of the nation’s largest firms offer generous parental leave policies ranging from 10 to 22 weeks, according to a list compiled by Chambers Associates. Few firms on the list offer 22 weeks as Sidley does. But several offer up to 20 weeks, including Norton Rose Fulbright, Shearman & Sterling, Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Fox Rothschild.
Other common changes include so-called “Ramp Up/Ramp Down” policies that aim to help attorneys reintegrate into the firm after an extended absence, and gender-neutral parental leave.
“Many firms have room for improvement in attracting and retaining high performing women and high performing female associates and partners,” Zeughauser Group consultant Kent Zimmermann said. “So I think market competitive parental leave policies are increasingly seen as strategically important.”
Caren Ulrich Stacy, CEO of Diversity Lab, an organization that works with law firms to develop novel diversity programs, said that the paradigm has shifted as parental leave policies become standard.
“The firms that went first were seen as family-innovative,” she said. “I think that enough firms have moved to extend their policy that it’s more of an expectation.”
While she is excited that robust parental leave policies are now commonplace because they signal industrywide progress on gender diversity, Ulrich Stacy said that many, especially male, attorneys don’t take full leave often enough for fear that taking time to tend to a newborn will hurt their career advancement.
“To me, that would signal true progress,” she said. “Are the structures and policies and procedures built into the culture so that men and women believe that they can take it and there won’t be consequences for their career?”
Men taking parental leave as much as their women colleagues is an important step to fostering a culture where leave is taken regularly, Ulrich Stacy said. Data from Diversity Lab shows that men and women see family-friendly policies as equally important, and many firms are moving away from bifurcated policies that give less leave to fathers.
“We know that if men take leave or advantage of any of these opportunities it opens the door,” she said.
Related Reading:
Take a Long Parental Leave and Make Partner? Dream On, Baby
Do Associate Perks Make a Difference in the Law Firm Talent War?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year' White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/03/Heather-McDevitt-767x633.jpg)
White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'
6 minute read![Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/11/67/f75a9f5d46b08088f1ca60a48425/karp-clement-barr-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism
4 minute read![Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024 Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2023/01/Snapchat-App-004-767x633.jpg)
![Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/03/Jones-Day-sign-01-767x633.jpg)
Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Grills DOJ on Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
- 2Exceptional Growth Becoming the Rule? Demand and Rate Hikes Drove Strong Year for Big Law
- 3Dentons Taps D.C. Capital Markets Attorney for New US Managing Partner
- 4Auto Dealers Ask Court to Pump the Brakes on Scout Motors’ Florida Sales
- 5German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250