Are Parental Leave Policies Innovative or Just Expected Now?
Sidley joins other firms, including Reed Smith and K&L Gates, in rolling out a more generous leave policy for its attorneys. Have parental leave policies become an industry standard?
August 07, 2019 at 03:10 PM
3 minute read
Sidley Austin is the latest firm to roll out or enhance a parental leave program, extending time off from 10 weeks to 14 weeks, removing primary and secondary caregiver distinctions and allowing birth mothers to use eight weeks of medical leave to extend their time away to 22 total weeks.
Larry Barden, chair of Sidley’s management committee, said the new policy is intended to attract “the next generation of lawyers.”
“The changes to our parental leave policy reflect the firm’s ongoing commitment to support our lawyers and attract the best talent,” Barden said in an email.
But Sidley is far from the only firm to enhance its leave policy in recent months. Both Reed Smith and K&L Gates, for example, have announced robust improvements to their leave programs in the past few weeks.
The question many are asking now is: Who doesn’t have a leave policy? And what role do these schemes play as firms increasingly turn to generous perks to lure the best talent?
A large chunk, if not the majority, of the nation’s largest firms offer generous parental leave policies ranging from 10 to 22 weeks, according to a list compiled by Chambers Associates. Few firms on the list offer 22 weeks as Sidley does. But several offer up to 20 weeks, including Norton Rose Fulbright, Shearman & Sterling, Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Fox Rothschild.
Other common changes include so-called “Ramp Up/Ramp Down” policies that aim to help attorneys reintegrate into the firm after an extended absence, and gender-neutral parental leave.
“Many firms have room for improvement in attracting and retaining high performing women and high performing female associates and partners,” Zeughauser Group consultant Kent Zimmermann said. “So I think market competitive parental leave policies are increasingly seen as strategically important.”
Caren Ulrich Stacy, CEO of Diversity Lab, an organization that works with law firms to develop novel diversity programs, said that the paradigm has shifted as parental leave policies become standard.
“The firms that went first were seen as family-innovative,” she said. “I think that enough firms have moved to extend their policy that it’s more of an expectation.”
While she is excited that robust parental leave policies are now commonplace because they signal industrywide progress on gender diversity, Ulrich Stacy said that many, especially male, attorneys don’t take full leave often enough for fear that taking time to tend to a newborn will hurt their career advancement.
“To me, that would signal true progress,” she said. “Are the structures and policies and procedures built into the culture so that men and women believe that they can take it and there won’t be consequences for their career?”
Men taking parental leave as much as their women colleagues is an important step to fostering a culture where leave is taken regularly, Ulrich Stacy said. Data from Diversity Lab shows that men and women see family-friendly policies as equally important, and many firms are moving away from bifurcated policies that give less leave to fathers.
“We know that if men take leave or advantage of any of these opportunities it opens the door,” she said.
|Related Reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means For Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 2Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 3Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 4Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 5Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250