LeClairRyan to Shut Down, Ending Three-Decade Run
After months of departures, the Am Law 200 firm acknowledged it could sustain itself no longer.
August 07, 2019 at 04:07 PM
7 minute read
LeClairRyan confirmed Wednesday that it is winding down, saying dissolution of the firm is ”in the best interests of our clients, colleagues and creditors.”
“The members of LeClairRyan PLLC have voted to commence an orderly wind-down of the firm’s business,” the firm said in a press release. “The firm, through its dissolution committee, is working in cooperation with its lender to ensure the continuity of client service until such time as the firm ceases to actively practice law and turns its attention to post-practice activities.”
The decision spells the end for an Am Law 200 firm that was in business for 31 years. LeClairRyan earlier this year had 21 offices and 225 attorneys. Its prominent clients over the years have included Ford Motor Co., United Airlines, FedEx and others.
The firm said Wednesday that it will continue to serve clients for a short period of time in current matters “to protect the interests” of clients, employees and creditors. “LeClairRyan is committed to ensuring a seamless transition for clients,” the firm said.
The announcement comes about a week after ALM reported that the Virginia-headquartered Am Law 200 firm was taking steps to dissolve, after months of partner defections. The firm’s gross revenue fell to $122 million in 2018, sliding from $142 million the year before.
The firm said it expects “remaining attorneys” will move to other law firms. An outside spokesperson for LeClairRyan declined to comment about the possibility of layoffs or a bankruptcy proceeding.
“On behalf of my colleagues, we are deeply saddened to make this announcement today,” now-former CEO C. Erik Gustafson said in a statement. “Through our transition, we will continue to focus first and foremost on the success of our clients, as we have always done. I am thankful to all of the clients who have chosen to work with our team over the last 30 years, and I am grateful for the exceptional lawyers and professionals who continue to work with dedication and determination towards winding down the firm in an orderly fashion.”
|What’s Next
As LeClairRyan’s operating days dwindle, the firm is likely pursuing a variety of avenues to preserve as many assets as possible, including getting bills out and negotiating with landlords, according to restructuring experts.
LeClairRyan associates have been told their last day is Aug. 30 while headhunters have been brought in to negotiate deals with remaining groups, said Bill Brandt, a law firm restructuring expert, in an interview this week.
Brandt, who has advised on more than three dozen law firm failures, said he has spoken with the firm’s senior and junior staff but is not consulting for the firm.
The firm wants to do as much as it can and get as many people situated by the end of August in its dissolution, Brandt said, while there will be a number of people who stay on for months afterward to help “tidy up.”
“You have to get the bills out, get collections in, deal with the bank,” said Brandt, chairman of Development Specialists Inc. “There’s a drill you have to do.”
The must-dos in this period, Brandt said, including converting the work in progress into billing and then sending invoices; collecting all outstanding invoices; and giving client records back to clients or to lawyers taking the client matters with them to new firms. On the latter point, Brandt noted that it often costs firms “thousands of dollars” to store client records, and law firms can’t just dump them.
LeClairRyan’s joint venture with alternative legal services provider UnitedLex last year, which created a joint entity called ULX Partners, “adds another wrinkle” to the firm’s final steps, he said, but ultimately lawyers will join other firms and may take as many clients, associates and staff with them as they can.
UnitedLex, in a statement Thursday, said, “LeClairRyan is a client the company supported – and continues to support through this next transition.”
|Feeling Squeezed
Every law firm dissolution will have different priorities, depending on its obligations for taxes, debts, pensions, vendors and landlords, noted Joff Mitchell, chief restructuring officer at Dewey & LeBoeuf during its Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Brandt said some law firm dissolutions happen without going to bankruptcy court, but he suspects there’s a chance LeClairRyan may wind up there.
One of the last troubled Am Law 200 firms, Sedgwick, filed for bankruptcy in October 2018, after many partner defections.
But in the last five years, Dickstein Shapiro and Bingham McCutchen found other law firms that took on a bulk of their firms’ attorneys.
Groups of lawyers at LeClairRyan are in talks with various firms now, ALM has reported, but whether any of those firms can take on the majority of its remaining lawyers remains to be seen.
Mitchell, now managing director at AlixPartners, said hundreds of law firms have dissolved without bankruptcies. “Bankruptcy is a costly process,” he said. “If the firm is able to dissolve itself and meet the creditor obligations, then it ultimately doesn’t need a Chapter 11 bankruptcy process.”
Of course, even if a law firm plans to avoid bankruptcy, it can still be forced into court. Howrey, which dissolved in 2011, was hit with an involuntary Chapter 7 petition that year by several of the defunct firm’s creditors.
However it proceeds, LeClairRyan’s situation highlights the perilous positions of some firms in the Am Law 200, especially in the Second Hundred.
Brandt said firms in LeClairRyan’s size bracket—in roughly the 200-partner range—are in a tough position. “Those midrange Am Law firms” don’t have the geographic and practice base to pull in lot of clients, but they can’t manage themselves like a boutique, he said. “They are very vulnerable right now.”
“Law firms are the epitome of folks who assume they will never need help, so the amount of planning they do for a worst-case scenario is zilch,” Brandt said. “I find most lawyers are incredibly ill-prepared for the demise of any law firm.”
LeClairRyan took some unconventional steps in its final years, including its June 2018 partnership with UnitedLex. Under the deal, LeClairRyan outsourced about 300 of its employees to UnitedLex, forming a joint venture called ULX Partners to provide services to the firm, and eventually to other law firms.
But that didn’t appear to stave off financial problems. ALM reported that in recent months, amid the mounting defections, LeClairRyan considered a number of options, including the creation of a new law firm.
Some lawyers received offers to join the new firm, which would have been called Novellus, a source with knowledge of the plans confirmed.
Lizzy McLellan, Jack Newsham and Dan Packel contributed reporting.
|Read More
LeClairRyan Leaders Moved to Launch New Firm as Partners Left
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readVersatility and 'Fearlessness' Drive Sullivan & Cromwell's Corporate Practice
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250