NY Hire Caps Eight-State Expansion for 'Hybrid' Law Firm
After adding its first partner in the Northeast this week, Atlanta-based Taylor English Duma says it's finding success with its quasi-virtual firm model.
August 12, 2019 at 06:15 PM
4 minute read
Two years ago, Atlanta-based Taylor English Duma hired its first remote partner, kicking off a strategic expansion plan premised on a new, “hybrid” business model.
By pairing its brick-and-mortar hub in Atlanta with a network of partners working remotely, the firm promised to offer clients a broader, high-caliber bench at a relative discount.
How is it working? According to CEO Kirk Hancock, Taylor English now has 20 remote partners across nine cities and eight states. The most recent addition, litigator Chi-Ru Jou, joined Monday from CKR Law in New York, giving the firm a presence in the Northeast for the first time.
Hancock said that, during the first year of its hybrid initiative as the firm was developing its process, it brought on about a half-dozen remote partners. The bulk of them have come aboard this year.
“I think we got better at explaining the model,” Hancock said.
A key architect of that model is Chris Wilson, who was Atlanta managing partner for virtual firm pioneer FisherBroyles before he joined Taylor English in 2017. Wilson styled the compensation approach for remote Taylor English partners after his old firm’s: Keep 80% of what you originate, split what you refer to another partner, work as much as you want or as little as you want. This is the model that Fishe;rBroyles break-off Culhane Meadows also employs.
Meanwhile, Taylor English’s physical headquarters supplies remote tech and marketing support, as well as a home base for remote lawyers who want to relocate to Georgia. Remote partners also have the same opportunities for advancement as those in Atlanta, including a path toward an equity stake in the firm. Hancock said it’s “too early” to tell whether that will become a common path for its hires.
Taylor English, which was solely based in Atlanta before embracing its quasi-virtual model, now has attorneys in Los Angeles; San Francisco; New York; Jacksonville, Florida; Raleigh, North Carolina; Washington, D.C.; Nashville, Tennessee; Houston; and Chicago. In 2017, the firm had roughly 150 attorneys. Today there are about 180.
The firm is still looking into ways to integrate the remote attorneys into the culture of the partnership without sacrificing their autonomy. It has done lunch-and-learns, virtual meetings and made other efforts, but Hancock says the there’s a plan to have the remote attorneys assemble in Atlanta and let everyone meet in person.
“Just like with your clients,” he said, “relationships happen best face to face.”
Hancock said the firm is always opportunistic when it comes to hiring, but wants to make sure its remote lawyers will be able to succeed.
“We want them to thrive in the model,” he said. “Not just exist.”
That opportunistic approach was evident in the firm’s latest hire. Hancock and the firm knew Jou’s former firm, CKR Law, was dealing with a variety of issues, including a discrimination suit, the departures of several partners and financial issues that resulted in partners not getting paid for months at a time.
“We wanted to see if we could make hay out of it, so to speak,” Hancock said.
Jou’s practice focuses on blockchain matters, and she advises clients on federal and state securities laws, money transmitter laws and smart contract dispute resolution. According to a firm statement Jou “represents investors, blockchain companies, cryptocurrency traders and advisers to blockchain companies in cryptocurrency-related commercial litigation as well as regulatory enforcement matters.”
Prior to joining Taylor English, Jou was a partner at CKR Law, a partner at Emergent and a partner at JSBarkats. She was of counsel at Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky and an associate at Bickel & Brewer, an associate at Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky and an associate at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison.
A spokesperson for CKR Law said, “We wish her the best in her future endeavors.”
Read More
This 150-Lawyer Atlanta Firm Is Now Opening … Everywhere
Stay-at-Home Rainmakers: A Growing Threat to Big Law
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
4 minute readFried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
3 minute readWeil Adds Acting Director of SEC Enforcement, Continuing Government Hiring Streak
3 minute readLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Trending Stories
- 1Troutman Pepper, Claiming Ex-Associate's Firing Was Performance Related, Seeks Summary Judgment in Discrimination Suit
- 2Law Firm Fails to Get Punitive Damages From Ex-Client
- 3Over 700 Residents Near 2023 Derailment Sue Norfolk for More Damages
- 4Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 5Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250