NY Hire Caps Eight-State Expansion for 'Hybrid' Law Firm
After adding its first partner in the Northeast this week, Atlanta-based Taylor English Duma says it's finding success with its quasi-virtual firm model.
August 12, 2019 at 06:15 PM
4 minute read
|
Two years ago, Atlanta-based Taylor English Duma hired its first remote partner, kicking off a strategic expansion plan premised on a new, “hybrid” business model.
By pairing its brick-and-mortar hub in Atlanta with a network of partners working remotely, the firm promised to offer clients a broader, high-caliber bench at a relative discount.
How is it working? According to CEO Kirk Hancock, Taylor English now has 20 remote partners across nine cities and eight states. The most recent addition, litigator Chi-Ru Jou, joined Monday from CKR Law in New York, giving the firm a presence in the Northeast for the first time.
Hancock said that, during the first year of its hybrid initiative as the firm was developing its process, it brought on about a half-dozen remote partners. The bulk of them have come aboard this year.
“I think we got better at explaining the model,” Hancock said.
A key architect of that model is Chris Wilson, who was Atlanta managing partner for virtual firm pioneer FisherBroyles before he joined Taylor English in 2017. Wilson styled the compensation approach for remote Taylor English partners after his old firm’s: Keep 80% of what you originate, split what you refer to another partner, work as much as you want or as little as you want. This is the model that Fishe;rBroyles break-off Culhane Meadows also employs.
Meanwhile, Taylor English’s physical headquarters supplies remote tech and marketing support, as well as a home base for remote lawyers who want to relocate to Georgia. Remote partners also have the same opportunities for advancement as those in Atlanta, including a path toward an equity stake in the firm. Hancock said it’s “too early” to tell whether that will become a common path for its hires.
Taylor English, which was solely based in Atlanta before embracing its quasi-virtual model, now has attorneys in Los Angeles; San Francisco; New York; Jacksonville, Florida; Raleigh, North Carolina; Washington, D.C.; Nashville, Tennessee; Houston; and Chicago. In 2017, the firm had roughly 150 attorneys. Today there are about 180.
The firm is still looking into ways to integrate the remote attorneys into the culture of the partnership without sacrificing their autonomy. It has done lunch-and-learns, virtual meetings and made other efforts, but Hancock says the there’s a plan to have the remote attorneys assemble in Atlanta and let everyone meet in person.
“Just like with your clients,” he said, “relationships happen best face to face.”
Hancock said the firm is always opportunistic when it comes to hiring, but wants to make sure its remote lawyers will be able to succeed.
“We want them to thrive in the model,” he said. “Not just exist.”
That opportunistic approach was evident in the firm’s latest hire. Hancock and the firm knew Jou’s former firm, CKR Law, was dealing with a variety of issues, including a discrimination suit, the departures of several partners and financial issues that resulted in partners not getting paid for months at a time.
“We wanted to see if we could make hay out of it, so to speak,” Hancock said.
Jou’s practice focuses on blockchain matters, and she advises clients on federal and state securities laws, money transmitter laws and smart contract dispute resolution. According to a firm statement Jou “represents investors, blockchain companies, cryptocurrency traders and advisers to blockchain companies in cryptocurrency-related commercial litigation as well as regulatory enforcement matters.”
Prior to joining Taylor English, Jou was a partner at CKR Law, a partner at Emergent and a partner at JSBarkats. She was of counsel at Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky and an associate at Bickel & Brewer, an associate at Dewey Pegno & Kramarsky and an associate at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison.
A spokesperson for CKR Law said, “We wish her the best in her future endeavors.”
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250