Legal Tech Can Differentiate Young Lawyers at Law Firm Interviews
This hiring season, law students interviewing with law firms should lead on legal tech.
August 14, 2019 at 02:00 PM
3 minute read
Law firm interview season is almost upon us. Traditionally, this is when hiring partners quiz law students on their awareness of the law and trends in the wider legal industry. But in today’s rapidly changing legal climate, students can expect to confront a new topic: legal tech.
Now is the time for students to ensure they are primed to face difficult questions about how legal tech is transforming the industry and client delivery and prepared with questions about how the interviewing firm fits within this new ecosystem.
What do new lawyers need to know going into these interviews? To start, they should represent themselves as change agents who embrace legal tech. Firms will want to hear that these interviewees are prepared to play a crucial role in ensuring these technologies are embedded right at the heart of the profession—and their firm.
Firms should seize this opportunity to hire “digital lawyers,” but that is a more nuanced concept than it may seem. In the legal industry, “digital” means more than technology. For example, it’s not about what specific technological tools you use to draw up a contract; it’s knowing that the world is moving too quickly for old-style contracts to keep pace. Digital lawyers adapt to work in ways that evolve in step with technology and deliver work product that does not lose relevance soon after it is created.
Embracing legal tech means bringing lawyers’ thinking into the present day and being eager to navigate the changes ahead.
Digital lawyers set themselves apart by combining legal knowledge with the technological savvy to predict what may happen to that dusty deliverable down the line. They will be the ones suggesting to their firm or business the best new ways to deliver legal services through technology. This could even mean changing the very shape of the law business itself.
What do these technological innovations look like? They go beyond the basic work product—they make work easier.
A key technology quandary for law firms is deciding where to make their next IT investment. Should they retreat to the safety of the well-established and familiar? Or should they venture outside their comfort zone? Reluctance to look beyond current platforms could force a firm to play catch-up. Of course, blind progress brings a whole raft of other problems, including wasted money and time.
New lawyers need to know how the best law businesses approach this issue. As legal tech becomes more widespread, the shrewdest law firms will examine different strata of legal services and reassess how to best resource each layer. That could mean deciding between humans and machines, or determining whether lawyers still need to be housed within the law firm or law department.
There are no easy answers in legal tech to turn to during an interview—or indeed for the wider legal industry. To stand the best chance of impressing interviewers, law students must demonstrate their knowledge of what it takes to become a digital lawyer, what the technological innovations mean for the industry, and how the best law businesses approach them.
Most important, interest in legal tech shouldn’t end at the interview. Becoming a digital lawyer—ready to fully embrace where the legal industry heads next—will be a necessary skill for the length of this next generation’s career.
Dan Reed is the CEO of UnitedLex.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readLosses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250