Katten Jumps on Rebranding Bandwagon With New Image, Website
In promoting a shorter name and refreshing other marketing elements, Katten is the latest big firm to bet on a rebranding effort to get clients' attention.
August 28, 2019 at 05:16 PM
4 minute read
Chicago-founded Katten Muchin Rosenman unveiled a major rebranding effort this week, embracing a shortened moniker, recasting a key practice area, and rolling out a redesigned website.
Already referred to by many in the industry as "Katten," the firm has leaned into the abbreviated name and will now operate under the domain "Katten.com." It will still be legally known as Katten Muchin Rosenman.
"The brand refresh was a perfect opportunity to make Katten our official market name," Roger Furey, chairman of Katten, said in an email. "It is a nod to our proud history and at the same time more practical and straightforward, much like the business-minded counsel we provide, leading our clients to commercially viable solutions."
Other elements of the rebrand, according to a firm press release, include "updated attorney bios and practice descriptions and a redesigned, more mobile-friendly website."
The rebrand is part of a three-year strategic plan the firm's partnership approved in early April of this year.
Along with the usual website and logo changes inherent to a legal rebrand, the firm also took the extra step of renaming one of its premiere practice areas, the financial services practice, which will now be known as its "financial markets and funds" practice.
Practice head Lance Zinman said the renaming was something that he had been thinking about for some time.
"It was a good name," Zinman said. "But my thought was, let's have a name that is more about precisely what we do," he said. He said the change does not reflect any change in the practice area focus but was tied to the overall firm rebrand.
"Just straight up being more direct in naming what we actually do," he said.
In general, Zinman said the practice group was having a good year, but that unstable markets can make things difficult.
"Our success is tied closely to our client's success," he said. "In this environment, some of our clients are doing well and some aren't. But overall, we are having a good year."
Although one of the largest firms to rebrand itself recently, Katten is hardly the only one. In June, Buffalo-based Goldberg Segalla, with over 400 attorneys across 20 offices, sprung a revamped image on its partnership. In the last year, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy jettisoned all but "Milbank" from its name; Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo became "Mintz"; and Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott formally changed its name to Bartlit Beck.
Smaller, Richmond, Virginia-based Hirschler Fleischer joined the rebranding parade back in October 2018, marketing itself as simply "Hirschler." The firm, like many of the others that rebranded recently, kept its former title as its legal name.
Almost a year into the new iteration, Hirschler CMO Kristen Chatterton said that responses have been positive both internally and from outside the firm.
"Client feedback has been outstanding," Chatterton said. "We have been seeing seeing more leads through the website than we ever have. Referral sources are up, and internally it was a big boost."
She cited internal events and some little things that seem to have gone a long way as factors in the rebranding's success.
A "spirit day" (a rally themed in purple for the firm's color change and featuring an array of music by Prince), new, professionally done photos of attorneys, and renewed focus on the firm's core practice strengths made a significant positive impact on firm moral, she said.
Chatterton said the rebrand was driven by the firm's desire to make it's national client base aware that it is not a "sleepy Virginia firm."
She said the firm used to be known mostly for Virginia real estate, but it has evolved to have practices in litigation and business that rival its real estate group, and giving those practice areas more weight was a goal of the rebranding effort.
"When we are pitching national clients," she said, "we feel like we can go toe to toe with national competitors."
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250