Midwest Merger Makes Taft an Am Law 100 Contender
After a merger with Briggs and Morgan, Taft Stettinius & Hollister will have more than 600 attorneys and anticipates gross revenue that could push it into the Am Law 100.
August 30, 2019 at 12:57 PM
3 minute read
Midwestern-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister is set to merge with Minneapolis-based Briggs and Morgan to expand the firm's presence in the Twin Cities, the latter firm announced Friday.
The merger, which will be effective at the beginning of 2020, will push Taft Stettinius' attorney head count to 610 lawyers spread out among 12 offices. Briggs' office in Minneapolis, which has 130 attorneys, will become Taft Stettinius' largest location, and its managing partner, Steve Ryan, will remain in the city as the location's partner-in-charge.
Ryan said Briggs spent the last three years searching earnestly for the best way to grow the firm ahead of disruption in the market, and the merger with Taft Stettinius came after considering more than 30 firms across the country.
"We were lucky to find a partner who shared our views of the marketplace, shared a client base similar to ours, and had change in their DNA," he said, adding that Briggs and Taft Stettinius had been in merger talks for about 18 months. "There was not a question, once we dug in, that this was the right combination for where we wanted to go."
Robert Hicks, Taft Stettinius' managing partner, said the talent at Briggs made a combination with the Twin Cities firm desirable, as did the opportunity to break into the Minneapolis market, which various Am Law 200 firms have tried to enter in the last few years.
"We were in complete alignment in terms of client perspective, but, more importantly, from a human and cultural perspective," Hicks said. "[Briggs] has a deep sense of community, lots of talent, and they really fit our other markets and models completely."
Hicks said the two firms shared strengths in some similar practice areas, such as transactional work and litigation. He also complimented Briggs's expertise in the energy, data privacy, railroad litigation and business practice areas, which, in addition to other specialties, he was excited to bring to Taft Stettinius' wheelhouse.
"It just strengthens the bench," Hicks said.
Ryan agreed, noting that with Taft's decentralized business model, his team would gain access to a network of 12 offices, each equipped with a group of experts to lend a hand.
"These are good practice areas for us, and we'll be able to do them on a bigger scale," he said.
Hicks added that Taft Stettinius' decentralization gives it an advantage over its competitors. That business model calls for each of Taft Stettinius' offices to be a complete, full-service firm, rather than having each practice group's members clustered in one office.
Hicks estimated the merger will bring Taft Stettinius' gross revenue to "well north of $350 million," which would put the firm securely in the Am Law 200, and push it close to the Am Law 100 threshold.
Postmerger, the firm will be competitive with firms in the bottom 50 of the Am Law 100, Hicks said, and he specifically named Barnes & Thornburg and Faegre Baker Daniels as peer group members.
"To be able to bring the strength, depth and breadth of the existing Briggs platform plays forward better than anything else we could have done, in terms of our vision," Hicks said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250