Midwest Merger Makes Taft an Am Law 100 Contender
After a merger with Briggs and Morgan, Taft Stettinius & Hollister will have more than 600 attorneys and anticipates gross revenue that could push it into the Am Law 100.
August 30, 2019 at 12:57 PM
3 minute read
Midwestern-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister is set to merge with Minneapolis-based Briggs and Morgan to expand the firm's presence in the Twin Cities, the latter firm announced Friday.
The merger, which will be effective at the beginning of 2020, will push Taft Stettinius' attorney head count to 610 lawyers spread out among 12 offices. Briggs' office in Minneapolis, which has 130 attorneys, will become Taft Stettinius' largest location, and its managing partner, Steve Ryan, will remain in the city as the location's partner-in-charge.
Ryan said Briggs spent the last three years searching earnestly for the best way to grow the firm ahead of disruption in the market, and the merger with Taft Stettinius came after considering more than 30 firms across the country.
"We were lucky to find a partner who shared our views of the marketplace, shared a client base similar to ours, and had change in their DNA," he said, adding that Briggs and Taft Stettinius had been in merger talks for about 18 months. "There was not a question, once we dug in, that this was the right combination for where we wanted to go."
Robert Hicks, Taft Stettinius' managing partner, said the talent at Briggs made a combination with the Twin Cities firm desirable, as did the opportunity to break into the Minneapolis market, which various Am Law 200 firms have tried to enter in the last few years.
"We were in complete alignment in terms of client perspective, but, more importantly, from a human and cultural perspective," Hicks said. "[Briggs] has a deep sense of community, lots of talent, and they really fit our other markets and models completely."
Hicks said the two firms shared strengths in some similar practice areas, such as transactional work and litigation. He also complimented Briggs's expertise in the energy, data privacy, railroad litigation and business practice areas, which, in addition to other specialties, he was excited to bring to Taft Stettinius' wheelhouse.
"It just strengthens the bench," Hicks said.
Ryan agreed, noting that with Taft's decentralized business model, his team would gain access to a network of 12 offices, each equipped with a group of experts to lend a hand.
"These are good practice areas for us, and we'll be able to do them on a bigger scale," he said.
Hicks added that Taft Stettinius' decentralization gives it an advantage over its competitors. That business model calls for each of Taft Stettinius' offices to be a complete, full-service firm, rather than having each practice group's members clustered in one office.
Hicks estimated the merger will bring Taft Stettinius' gross revenue to "well north of $350 million," which would put the firm securely in the Am Law 200, and push it close to the Am Law 100 threshold.
Postmerger, the firm will be competitive with firms in the bottom 50 of the Am Law 100, Hicks said, and he specifically named Barnes & Thornburg and Faegre Baker Daniels as peer group members.
"To be able to bring the strength, depth and breadth of the existing Briggs platform plays forward better than anything else we could have done, in terms of our vision," Hicks said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Trending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250