MIT Hires Goodwin Procter to Investigate Jeffrey Epstein Donations
Goodwin Procter partner Roberto Braceras will lead the investigation for MIT as the university enters a legal morass created by deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
September 10, 2019 at 04:19 PM
4 minute read
Goodwin Procter partner Roberto Braceras will lead the investigation into the donations disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein funneled to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Media Lab, the firm said Tuesday.
Braceras is the former head of the firm's litigation department in Boston, and according to his online firm profile, he represents companies and universities in "a wide variety of government investigations and civil litigation." He has also represented MIT in class action claims that sought "greater 'accessibility' to various websites," according to his online profile.
The firm is remaining tight-lipped about the investigation, which MIT president L. Rafael Reif first announced in a Monday letter.
Besides confirming that Braceras was leading the legal team, the only other detail a Goodwin spokeswoman revealed was that Goodwin partner Jennifer Chunias in Boston was also on the investigation team. Chunias, a member of the firm's securities litigation, white-collar defense and business litigation group, focuses on government and internal investigations and higher education litigation.
"We have asked the firm to explore all donations received by MIT, both those that came directly from Jeffrey Epstein and his associated foundations, and any donations that may have been received at the direction of Jeffrey Epstein," Reif wrote in the Monday letter. "In addition, the investigation will cover who at MIT may have been aware of the donations. We have instructed Goodwin Procter to follow the evidence where it leads, and we are counting on this independent investigation to ascertain the facts."
Reif said the investigation will "take time, on the order of a month." The firm will report its findings to Reif and the school's governing board, formally known as the Executive Committee of the MIT Corp.
MIT's decision to retain Goodwin Procter comes on the heels of reporting by The New Yorker, which obtained emails and other records showing that MIT's Media Lab had accepted more money from Epstein, a convicted sex offender who was facing more charges of sex trafficking until he killed himself last month, than it had previously acknowledged and tried to keep those donations a secret.
The New Yorker's reporting led to the resignation of Joi Ito, the Media Lab's director.
Goodwin Procter is the latest law firm to be retained by individuals and institutions that were in Epstein's orbit. In August, Epstein's longtime corporate attorney, Darren Indyke, hired criminal defense attorney Marc Agnifilo while others turned to Sercacz & Riopelle and Bachner & Associates. Boies Schiller Flexner is representing at least eight of Epstein's victims on a pro bono basis.
Even though Epstein died in a Manhattan jail cell Aug. 10, U.S. Attorney General William Barr has vowed to continue prosecuting any co-conspirators.
A proliferation of investigations at universities into alleged misconduct has kept law firms busy and paid.
For examples, Perkins Coie raked in $6.2 million total in investigating the decades of sexual abuse allegedly committed by Richard Strauss, a deceased Ohio State University athletic doctor.
In another Ohio State University matter, Debevoise & Plimpton was paid $1 million as a result of partner Mary Jo White's investigation into the university's head football coach Urban Meyer in 2018.
|Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250