Law Firms Commit $5M to Tackle Legal Profession's Diversity Problem
Five firms will collaborate, sharing their success and failures, as each strives to achieve its own robust diversity goals.
September 18, 2019 at 11:41 AM
4 minute read
|
Five law firms have joined together with 26 general counsel to establish a $5 million fund for research initiatives and programs designed to address the lack of diversity in the legal profession.
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe; Goodwin Procter; Eversheds Sutherland; and Stoel Rives have agreed to participate in the project along with the 26 GCs, who hail from such corporations as Bloomberg, Ford Motor Co., Starbucks and 3M, among others. A fifth law firm will be chosen through a blind application and selection processes.
Dubbed the "Move The Needle Fund," the pool of money will be used to incubate new approaches to tackling the pernicious issue of diversity within law firms, especially at the equity level. The goal is to boost retention, promotion and opportunities for women, minorities and others to make the profession more diverse.
The law firms are setting public goals that are measurable and will be tracked. They'll report on their progress via a website over the next five years.
Each participating firm has developed a five-year plan setting its own goals in the area of diversity. In the early stages, the firms will work closely with Diversity Lab and its data team to identify the firm's relevant shortfalls and strengths. Then, each firm will develop a handful of programs to address its goal while sharing their successes and failures.
Stoel Rives is targeting retention rates and aims to improve the retention rate of its "diverse attorneys" so it matches the rate of its nondiverse attorneys by 2025. To achieve this goal, the firm will have to raise its retention rate for "diverse attorneys" by 40%.
Goodwin wants the firm's senior associates and partners elevated within the next five years to reflect or exceed the diversity of its first-year associate class, which will, in turn, reflect the diversity rate of graduating law school classes: 50% women and 33% racial and ethnic minorities. Additionally, the firm wants to ensure that the collective composition of all firm leadership committees will be at least 40% diverse.
By 2025, Eversheds Sutherland plans to increase its partnership to 33% female and 15% ethnically and racially diverse.
Orrick is focusing on clients for its diversity goal, pledging to have 40 of its most strategic clients served by teams that are "at a minimum 55% diverse" by 2025.
Orrick chairman Mitch Zuklie said that the collaborative approach — with Diversity Lab, other firms and clients — is a vitally important aspect of this initiative.
"It gives us a chance to work with leaders both in-house and at other firms to understand what's working for them and what's not," he said.
Goodwin chairman David Hashmall said that setting public goals will be more beneficial in the long run, as opposed to the traditional approach of privately hashing out diversity benchmarks.
"We're also going out there with a public goal, which is a risk," Hashmall said. "But I believe that going public will give greater urgency and strength to our efforts."
Stoel Rives managing partner-elect Melissa Jones said the business case for diversity is evident.
"Our clients value variety of experience and viewpoint and they are insisting upon more diverse talent in their outside counsel. It is crucial to the success of our profession to continue to collaborate with organizations like Diversity Lab."
GCs and their legal departments have also committed to a few collective actions, including increasing the pipeline of junior lawyers of diverse backgrounds; committing significant legal spend to diverse law firm teams and providing new business opportunities; and requiring current outside counsel to provide annual diversity data and rewarding compliance to diversity goals.
Additionally, more than 25 founding GCs are asking other legal departments to join them in their collective action by 2020.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readVersatility and 'Fearlessness' Drive Sullivan & Cromwell's Corporate Practice
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Latham & Watkins Successfully Defend Patents at the ITC for Cosmetic Devices
- 2Morgan Lewis Aims to Grow in Paris With Kramer Levin Acquisition
- 3Paul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
- 4Eckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
- 5GC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250